Gigabyte Z390 GAMING X

Performance Results


Gaming 34% Sail boat	Desktop 97% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 30% Sail boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 95.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	30.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	213% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	Gigabyte Z390 GAMING X
Motherboard	Gigabyte Z390 GAMING X (all builds)
Memory	11.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190314
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jul 23 '21 at 21:35
Run Duration	223 Seconds
Run User	LBN-User
Background CPU	1%

Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (44^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-8700-$200 349,567 User benchmarks, average bench 87% U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	95.6% Outstanding	Memory 93.9 1-Core 137 2-Core 267 93% 166 Pts	4-Core 524 8-Core 786 81% 655 Pts	64-Core 933 58% 933 Pts
Poor: 75% ↑ This bench: 95.6% Great: 94%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% Zotac(19DA 2454) CLim: 2012 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 461.40 Performing way above expectations (85^th percentile)	30.5% Below average	Lighting 38.8 Reflection 43.4 Parallax 38.9 32% 40.4 fps	MRender 37.8 Gravity 39.9 Splatting 29 28% 35.6 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 30.5% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Adata SX6000LNP 1TB 7,052 User benchmarks, average bench 191% 382GB free (System drive) Firmware: V9001c00 SusWrite @10s intervals: 1006 1029 1048 1053 1052 1051 MB/s Performing above expectations (70^th percentile)	213% Outstanding	Read 1,678 Write 1,007 Mixed 867 SusWrite 1,040 256% 1,148 MB/s	4K Read 38.4 4K Write 124 4K Mixed 49.2 187% 70.4 MB/s	DQ Read 476 DQ Write 667 DQ Mixed 456 377% 533 MB/s
Poor: 101% ↑ This bench: 213% Great: 268%
Kingston SSDNow V300 120GB-$38 339,020 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 101GB free Firmware: 60AABBF0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 105 96 89 76 84 84 MB/s Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	53.2% Above average	Read 142 Write 114 Mixed 114 SusWrite 89 26% 115 MB/s	4K Read 25.2 4K Write 95.6 4K Mixed 26.5 123% 49.1 MB/s	DQ Read 127 DQ Write 108 DQ Mixed 87.5 74% 107 MB/s
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 53.2% Great: 73%
WD Blue 2.5" 250GB (2010)-$33 2,800 User benchmarks, average bench 28% 173GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 45 65 65 66 65 65 MB/s Performing way above expectations (85^th percentile)	35.7% Below average	Read 62.5 Write 65.2 Mixed 46.8 SusWrite 61.8 44% 59.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.7 126% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 35.7% Great: 41%
Seagate Expansion 4TB 22,017 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 3TB free Firmware: 0708 SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 12 12 12 12 12 MB/s Performing way below expectations (0^th percentile)	6.32% Terrible	Read 10 Write 10.5 Mixed 11 SusWrite 12 8% 10.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.1 4K Write 0.2 4K Mixed 0.1 19% 0.13 MB/s
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 6.32% Great: 66%
Seagate BUP Slim BK 1TB 18,390 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 18GB free Firmware: 0108 SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 12 12 12 12 12 MB/s Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	6.39% Terrible	Read 8.7 Write 21.5 Mixed 15.3 SusWrite 12.1 11% 14.4 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 3.6 4K Mixed 0.7 186% 1.77 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 6.39% Great: 63%
SAMSUNG HM500JI 500GB 31 User benchmarks, average bench 16% 108GB free, PID 70f1 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.6 9.4 9.6 9.5 9.4 11 MB/s Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	9.47% Terrible	Read 16 Write 19.3 Mixed 15.7 SusWrite 9.7 21% 15.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.7 80% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 9.47% Great: 20%
TOSHIBA MK3259GSX 320GB 123 User benchmarks, average bench 14% 210GB free, PID 70f1 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete		Read 11 Mixed 4.2 7% 7.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0.2 8% 0.2 MB/s
Poor: 9% Great: 19%
Samsung G2 Portable 500GB 768 User benchmarks, average bench 17% 34GB free, PID 6033 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.4 9.4 9.4 9.3 9.3 9.4 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	8.81% Terrible	Read 14.2 Write 16.2 Mixed 15.7 SusWrite 9.3 19% 13.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.6 73% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 8.81% Great: 21%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 3200 C18 1x16GB 2,305 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 1 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)	50.6% Above average	MC Read 17.1 MC Write 18.3 MC Mixed 14.1 47% 16.5 GB/s	SC Read 13.8 SC Write 20.3 SC Mixed 18.8 50% 17.6 GB/s	Latency 60.1 67% 60.1 ns
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 50.6% Great: 62%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-Z390 GAMING X-CF Builds (Compare 11,874 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 114%

UFO

Desktop 100%

UFO

Workstation 105%

UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte Z390 GAMING X - $225

CPU
Core i7-9700KIntel $252Bench 97%, 550,833 samples	2,973x
Core i5-9600KIntel $155Bench 93%, 321,194 samples	2,732x
Core i9-9900KIntel $410Bench 98%, 354,223 samples	1,637x

GPU
RTX 2070S (Super)Nvidia $210Bench 115%, 663,603 samples	936x
RTX 2060Nvidia $324Bench 90%, 645,160 samples	871x
RTX 2070Nvidia $200Bench 104%, 478,117 samples	770x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	454x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	444x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	345x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $45Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	482x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	400x
HyperX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBKingstonBench 86%, 239,203 samples	337x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 117% - Outstanding

Total price: $775

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16