Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (79th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 21 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	3.44% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing above expectations (79^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5-1607 v2 1,768 User benchmarks, average bench 65% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	69.9% Good	Memory 84 1-Core 83.7 2-Core 166 66% 111 Pts	4-Core 326 8-Core 315 43% 321 Pts	64-Core 321 20% 321 Pts
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 69.9% Great: 72%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro K600 8,087 User benchmarks, average bench 3% HP(103C 094B) 1GB CLim: 875 MHz, MLim: 445 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 441.12 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	3.44% Terrible	Lighting 3.9 Reflection 5.4 Parallax 4.7 3% 4.67 fps	MRender 5 Gravity 5 Splatting 4.6 4% 4.87 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 3.44% Great: 4%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial MTFDDAK256MAY-1AH1ZABHA 256GB 909 User benchmarks, average bench 85% 73GB free (System drive) Firmware: M504 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 386 Write 248 Mixed 147 57% 261 MB/s	4K Read 23.8 4K Write 52.9 4K Mixed 30.3 103% 35.7 MB/s	DQ Read 368 DQ Write 171 DQ Mixed 119 128% 219 MB/s
Poor: 62% Great: 105%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M391B5173QH0-YK0 4x4GB 181 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 4 of 8 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	80.7% Excellent	MC Read 30.3 MC Write 36.2 MC Mixed 28 90% 31.5 GB/s	SC Read 13.6 SC Write 11.1 SC Mixed 11.1 34% 11.9 GB/s	Latency 73.5 54% 73.5 ns
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 80.7% Great: 81%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 17%

Surfboard

Desktop 72%

Battleship

Workstation 15%

Surfboard

GPU
Quadro K4000NvidiaBench 13%, 11,114 samples	237x
Quadro K2000NvidiaBench 7%, 13,526 samples	217x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	93x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	73x
LCS-256M6S 2.5 7mm 256GBLiteonitBench 83%, 11,477 samples	51x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	44x

RAM
HMT451R7AFR8C-RD 4x4GBHynixBench 82%, 1,002 samples	167x
9JSF51272PZ-1G9E2 4x4GBMicronBench 82%, 908 samples	145x
HMT41GR7AFR4C-RD 4x8GBHynixBench 78%, 598 samples	87x

Value: 64% - Good

Total price: $373

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $79	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16