Asus PRIME Q270M-C

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 20%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 47.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics31.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive65.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (71%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus PRIME Q270M-C  (all builds)
Memory10.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190524
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 14 '22 at 20:55
Run Duration191 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 71%

 PC Performing below expectations (28th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6400-$79
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
47.7% Average
Memory 71.1
1-Core 68.1
2-Core 140
55% 93.2 Pts
4-Core 134
8-Core 212
21% 173 Pts
64-Core 261
16% 261 Pts
Poor: 39%
This bench: 47.7%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 470-$126
CLim: 1230 MHz, MLim: 1650 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 21.12.1
Performing below potential (10th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
31.9% Below average
Lighting 35.3
Reflection 56.6
Parallax 56.8
29% 49.6 fps
MRender 56.6
Gravity 42.4
Splatting 42.1
38% 47 fps
Poor: 32%
This bench: 31.9%
Great: 47%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
PNY CS900 120GB-$25
16GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CS900613
SusWrite @10s intervals: 178 100 155 73 99 76 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
65.9% Good
Read 388
Write 216
Mixed 273
SusWrite 114
55% 247 MB/s
4K Read 28.4
4K Write 58.3
4K Mixed 27.1
109% 37.9 MB/s
DQ Read 248
DQ Write 220
DQ Mixed 184
152% 218 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 65.9%
Great: 87%
WD Blue SN550 NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$68
387GB free
Firmware: 211070WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 507 407 412 413 406 406 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
154% Outstanding
Read 1,144
Write 1,249
Mixed 1,006
SusWrite 425
215% 956 MB/s
4K Read 34.1
4K Write 97.4
4K Mixed 50.2
168% 60.6 MB/s
DQ Read 896
DQ Write 474
DQ Mixed 613
475% 661 MB/s
Poor: 152%
This bench: 154%
Great: 237%
Toshiba MQ01ABF050 500GB-$32
58GB free
Firmware: AM0P4C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 78 79 80 80 79 80 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
38.6% Below average
Read 55.2
Write 55.2
Mixed 25.2
SusWrite 79.3
39% 53.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.5
98% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 38.6%
Great: 60%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$24
411GB free
Firmware: HP73
SusWrite @10s intervals: 131 132 133 133 133 133 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
73.5% Very good
Read 124
Write 125
Mixed 62.3
SusWrite 133
81% 111 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.7
123% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 73.5%
Great: 88%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Ramaxel RMUA5110MB78HAF-2400 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
52.4% Above average
MC Read 19.4
MC Write 20.4
MC Mixed 18
55% 19.3 GB/s
SC Read 8
SC Write 17.1
SC Mixed 12.5
36% 12.5 GB/s
Latency 98.9
40% 98.9 ns
Poor: 52%
This bench: 52.4%
Great: 78%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PRIME Q270M-C Builds (Compare 229 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus PRIME Q270M-C

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 88% - Excellent Total price: $167
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback