Asrock H87 Performance

Performance Results


Gaming 36% Jet ski	Desktop 79% Battleship	Workstation 30% Sail boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	42.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	52.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Asrock H87 Performance (all builds)
Memory	27.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20160114
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Apr 19 '22 at 00:53
Run Duration	245 Seconds
Run User	JPN-User
Background CPU	7%

Watch Gameplay: 1650 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (40^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-4770-$75 176,321 User benchmarks, average bench 70% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)	75.3% Very good	Memory 84.4 1-Core 101 2-Core 196 73% 127 Pts	4-Core 358 8-Core 554 56% 456 Pts	64-Core 562 35% 562 Pts
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 75.3% Great: 78%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650-$155 259,091 User benchmarks, average bench 43% Zotac(19DA 3595) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 497.29 Performing below potential (48^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	42.3% Average	Lighting 51.7 Reflection 56.9 Parallax 52.2 42% 53.6 fps	MRender 62.5 Gravity 49.7 Splatting 46.5 42% 52.9 fps
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 42.3% Great: 46%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Team L7 EVO SSD 240GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 54GB free (System drive) Firmware: V2.5 SusWrite @10s intervals: 234 144 96 99 101 97 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	52.9% Above average	Read 374 Write 334 Mixed 271 SusWrite 128 62% 277 MB/s	4K Read 24.4 4K Write 60.9 4K Mixed 10.9 83% 32.1 MB/s	DQ Read 112 DQ Write 170 DQ Mixed 17.2 48% 99.9 MB/s
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 52.9% Great: 53%
Toshiba DT01ACA200 2TB-$50 344,862 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 6GB free Firmware: ABB0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 135 96 110 108 152 97 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	57.4% Above average	Read 83.8 Write 84.1 Mixed 24.7 SusWrite 116 56% 77.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.6 121% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 57.4% Great: 108%
Hitachi HDS72202 2TB 246 User benchmarks, average bench 56% 4GB free Firmware: A28A Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 63.1 Write 68.4 Mixed 43 43% 58.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.1 4K Mixed 0.7 123% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 37% Great: 69%
Hitachi HDN724030AL 3TB 40 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 8GB free Firmware: A5E0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 121 134 134 140 84 63 MB/s Performing as expected (58^th percentile)	73.4% Very good	Read 143 Write 146 Mixed 28.9 SusWrite 113 78% 108 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 0.8 176% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 73.4% Great: 90%
Seagate Barracuda Green 2TB 8,189 User benchmarks, average bench 57% 4GB free Firmware: CC41 SusWrite @10s intervals: 99 85 103 93 91 103 MB/s Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)	48.8% Average	Read 74.6 Write 74.7 Mixed 58.3 SusWrite 95.7 56% 75.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.2 4K Write 0.8 4K Mixed 0.4 68% 0.47 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 48.8% Great: 74%
Hitachi Deskstar 7K3000 3TB-$63 6,344 User benchmarks, average bench 68% 39GB free Firmware: MKAO SusWrite @10s intervals: 66 71 69 74 77 78 MB/s Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	57.6% Above average	Read 128 Write 101 Mixed 75.8 SusWrite 72.6 70% 94.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.7 132% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 57.6% Great: 87%
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2017)-$79 179,101 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 1GB free Firmware: 0001 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 17.6 Write 99.2 Mixed 38.3 38% 51.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 0.5 4K Mixed 0.9 143% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 40% Great: 90%
WD WD60EZAZ-00ZGHB0 6TB 1,497 User benchmarks, average bench 68% 6GB free Firmware: 80.0 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 168 Write 157 Mixed 74.5 98% 133 MB/s	4K Read 2.3 4K Write 8.5 4K Mixed 0.6 320% 3.8 MB/s	DQ Read 0.7 DQ Write 11.3 DQ Mixed 1 24% 4.33 MB/s
Poor: 23% Great: 101%
WD Red 3TB (2012)-$86 68,726 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 15GB free Firmware: 82.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 95 94 96 96 97 95 MB/s Performing below expectations (20^th percentile)	53.7% Above average	Read 91.3 Write 93.7 Mixed 64.9 SusWrite 95.4 64% 86.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 1 189% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 53.7% Great: 88%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 4x8GB 41,916 User benchmarks, average bench 70% 4 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing as expected (47^th percentile)	57.1% Above average	MC Read 21.3 MC Write 21.1 MC Mixed 16.2 56% 19.5 GB/s	SC Read 16.3 SC Write 20.5 SC Mixed 19.9 54% 18.9 GB/s	Latency 72.9 55% 72.9 ns
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 57.1% Great: 115%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical H87 Performance Builds (Compare 477 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 36%

Jet ski

Desktop 75%

Battleship

Workstation 28%

Raft

Motherboard: Asrock H87 Performance - $141

CPU
Core i5-4670Intel $51Bench 66%, 49,019 samples	65x
Core i7-4770Intel $75Bench 70%, 176,321 samples	63x
Core i5-4670KIntel $62Bench 68%, 128,482 samples	53x

GPU
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	42x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	37x
GTX 650Nvidia $112Bench 8%, 69,673 samples	21x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	20x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $74Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	16x
MX500 1TBCrucial $66Bench 106%, 202,785 samples	15x

RAM
Savage DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBHyperXBench 51%, 78,181 samples	15x
Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x4GBHyperXBench 51%, 27,462 samples	12x
8JTF51264AZ-1G6E1 Kingston 99U5471-020.A00LF 8JTF51264AZ-1G6E1 12GBMicronBench 49%, 25 samples	11x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 63% - Good

Total price: $420

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $64	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16