Performance Results


Gaming 5% Tree trunk	Desktop 40% Speed boat	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (20th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 80 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 42.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	3.15% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	38.3% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	10GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 10GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing way below expectations (20^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Athlon II X4 640-$70 18,839 User benchmarks, average bench 45% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (45^th percentile)	42.7% Average	Memory 55.5 1-Core 45.4 2-Core 90.8 39% 63.9 Pts	4-Core 174 8-Core 176 23% 175 Pts	64-Core 175 11% 175 Pts
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 42.7% Great: 53%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 730 164,888 User benchmarks, average bench 5% Device(0000 0000) ≥ 4GB CLim: 700 MHz, MLim: 300 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 391.35 Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	3.15% Terrible	Lighting 3.8 Reflection 5 Parallax 1.2 3% 3.33 fps	MRender 4.6 Gravity 4.3 Splatting 3.3 3% 4.07 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 3.15% Great: 7%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Apacer AS340 240GB 10,970 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 123GB free (System drive) Firmware: V4.11 SusWrite @10s intervals: 167 172 165 172 172 174 MB/s Performing below potential (6^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	38.3% Below average	Read 195 Write 172 Mixed 161 SusWrite 170 39% 174 MB/s	4K Read 15.3 4K Write 40.3 4K Mixed 12.9 61% 22.8 MB/s	DQ Read 26.6 DQ Write 56.3 DQ Mixed 20.7 22% 34.5 MB/s
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 38.3% Great: 95%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown Hynix HMT325U6BFR8C-H9 10GB 14 User benchmarks, average bench 28% 667, 667 MHz 8192, 2048 MB Performing below potential (14^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	20.4% Poor	MC Read 8.3 MC Write 6.2 MC Mixed 6.1 20% 6.87 GB/s	SC Read 6.5 SC Write 5.7 SC Mixed 5.7 17% 5.97 GB/s	Latency 142 28% 142 ns
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 20.4% Great: 36%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 21%

Surfboard

Desktop 60%

Destroyer

Workstation 16%

Surfboard

GPU
R9 280XAMD $500Bench 35%, 94,130 samples	4x
GeForce GT 730NvidiaBench 5%, 164,888 samples	4x
HD 7850AMD $174Bench 19%, 49,592 samples	4x

Value: 25% - Poor

Total price: $621

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16