PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
Processor | With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
Graphics | 49% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 86.3% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
Memory | 32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Asus PRIME X470-PRO (all builds) |
Memory | 21.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit색 |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20180712 |
Uptime | 0.8 Days |
Run Date | Aug 12 '22 at 15:02 |
Run Duration | 252 Seconds |
Run User | JPN-User |
Background CPU | 2% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
79.1%
Very good
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485
Gigabyte(1458 374D) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 512.15
|
49%
Average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$52
55GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 246 195 186 179 176 172 MB/s
|
86.3%
Excellent
|
|||
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$95
99GB free
Firmware: EXT0CB6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 382 276 276 276 275 276 MB/s
|
103%
Outstanding
|
|||
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$159
350GB free
Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1004 1099 1100 1116 1125 1112 MB/s
|
234%
Outstanding
|
|||
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28
130GB free
Firmware: CC45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 114 125 123 124 124 126 MB/s
|
73.5%
Very good
|
|||
Verbatim OTG 32GB
26GB free, PID 5200
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 10 18 15 15 18 18 MB/s
|
14.9%
Very poor
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung M378A2K43CB1-CTD 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 2666 MHz clocked @ 1333 MHz
|
88.8%
Excellent
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Ryzen 7 2700XAMD $210Bench 76%, 159,077 samples | 1,954x |
Ryzen 5 2600XAMD $189Bench 74%, 142,983 samples | 437x |
Ryzen 5 2600AMD $150Bench 73%, 179,588 samples | 405x |
GPU | |
---|---|
RTX 2070S (Super)Nvidia $210Bench 115%, 663,603 samples | 288x |
RTX 2070Nvidia $200Bench 104%, 478,117 samples | 287x |
RTX 2060Nvidia $294Bench 90%, 645,160 samples | 250x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 110% - Outstanding | Total price: $647 |