Gigabyte GA-Z170-HD3P

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 58%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 47%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics57.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive256% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-Z170-HD3P  (all builds)
Memory12.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20160108
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateFeb 21 '16 at 18:45
Run Duration231 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6600K-$130
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
86.4% Excellent
Memory 94.9
1-Core 113
2-Core 222
82% 143 Pts
4-Core 450
8-Core 452
60% 451 Pts
64-Core 457
28% 457 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 86.4%
Great: 85%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 Fury-X-$781
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.301.1801.1001
Performing below potential (43rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
57.5% Above average
Lighting 71.9
Reflection 56.3
Parallax 96.9
59% 75 fps
MRender 56.2
Gravity 71.8
Splatting 72
55% 66.6 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 57.5%
Great: 65%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
158GB free
Firmware: EMT0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
117% Outstanding
Read 506
Write 400
Mixed 412
98% 439 MB/s
4K Read 48.8
4K Write 107
4K Mixed 49.8
194% 68.4 MB/s
DQ Read 339
DQ Write 238
DQ Mixed 117
134% 231 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 117%
Great: 124%
Samsun 470 Series SSD 64GB
35GB free
Firmware: AXM0 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
36.8% Below average
Read 237
Write 153
Mixed 168
41% 186 MB/s
4K Read 17.3
4K Write 28.9
4K Mixed 8.12
52% 18.1 MB/s
DQ Read 104
DQ Write 26.9
DQ Mixed 8.83
21% 46.7 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 36.8%
Great: 43%
Samsung SM951 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB-$31
25GB free (System drive)
Firmware: BXW7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
256% Outstanding
Read 1,954
Write 1,180
Mixed 1,386
333% 1,506 MB/s
4K Read 55.3
4K Write 212
4K Mixed 61.7
275% 110 MB/s
DQ Read 659
DQ Write 366
DQ Mixed 264
263% 430 MB/s
Poor: 119%
This bench: 256%
Great: 243%
WD WD15EARS-00MVWB0 1.5TB
1TB free
Firmware: 51.0 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
44.1% Average
Read 83.6
Write 70.4
Mixed 69.8
56% 74.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.007
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 0.01
7% 0.11 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 44.1%
Great: 66%
WD WD5000BEVT-22ZAT 500GB
8GB free
Firmware: 01.0 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
26.8% Poor
Read 44.3
Write 48.9
Mixed 44.9
35% 46 MB/s
4K Read 0.31
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.22
63% 0.64 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 26.8%
Great: 40%
ASMT 2105 500GB
244GB free, PID 55aa
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
31.1% Below average
Read 79.2
Write 85
Mixed 85.9
109% 83.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.11
4K Write 0.34
4K Mixed 0.12
16% 0.19 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 31.1%
Great: 171%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB-$37
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3000 MHz
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
101% Outstanding
MC Read 36.1
MC Write 40.2
MC Mixed 33.4
104% 36.6 GB/s
SC Read 19.4
SC Write 38.5
SC Mixed 27.5
81% 28.5 GB/s
Latency 57.4
70% 57.4 ns
Poor: 58%
This bench: 101%
Great: 104%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-Z170-HD3P-CF Builds (Compare 2,526 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 51%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 44%
Speed boat

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z170-HD3P - $113

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $546
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback