Asrock H270M-ITX/ac

Performance Results


Gaming 84% Aircraft carrier	Desktop 94% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 67% Battle cruiser


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (75th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 25 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	91.1% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	173% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago.

Motherboard	Asrock H270M-ITX/ac (all builds)
Memory	28.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180316
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	May 16 '18 at 03:47
Run Duration	155 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	2%

Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-7600-$89 39,689 User benchmarks, average bench 72% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	88.4% Excellent	Memory 90.8 1-Core 128 2-Core 253 88% 157 Pts	4-Core 500 8-Core 480 66% 490 Pts	64-Core 490 30% 490 Pts
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 88.4% Great: 82%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132 1,459,281 User benchmarks, average bench 80% EVGA(3842 6676) CLim: 2012 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 397.64 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	91.1% Outstanding	Lighting 117 Reflection 118 Parallax 97.3 95% 111 fps	MRender 98.5 Gravity 103 Splatting 103 83% 102 fps
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 91.1% Great: 88%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 EVO 250GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 87% 998GB free Firmware: M0MU031 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 235 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 159 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 100 100 1 (AE) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 58 46 231929348138 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (CA) Data Address Mark errors 100 100 0 (CE) Flying height 100 100 0 (F6) Unknown 100 100 3293367554 (F7) Unknown 100 100 103040055 (F8) Unknown 100 100 33326991 (B4) Unknown 0 0 9385 (D2) Unknown 100 100 0	91.1% Outstanding	Read 481 Write 397 Mixed 395 94% 424 MB/s	4K Read 21.4 4K Write 78.6 4K Mixed 30.4 113% 43.5 MB/s	DQ Read 336 DQ Write 245 DQ Mixed 29.2 93% 203 MB/s
Poor: 83% ↑ This bench: 91.1% Great: 91%
Plextor M8Pe NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$200 2,380 User benchmarks, average bench 196% 184GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1.06 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile)	173% Outstanding	Read 1,934 Write 811 Mixed 913 267% 1,220 MB/s	4K Read 27.7 4K Write 61.4 4K Mixed 33.7 118% 40.9 MB/s	DQ Read 295 DQ Write 117 DQ Mixed 76.8 91% 163 MB/s
Poor: 128% ↑ This bench: 173% Great: 237%
Toshiba DT01ACA300 3TB-$80 85,620 User benchmarks, average bench 85% 1.5TB free Firmware: MX6OABB0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (77^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 140 140 68 (03) Spinup time 137 137 34387198371 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 3745 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 124 124 33 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 5240 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 2097 (C0) Power-off retract count 97 97 4433 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 97 97 4433 (C2) HDA temperature 142 142 244814118954 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	99.9% Outstanding	Read 180 Write 168 Mixed 150 125% 166 MB/s	4K Read 0.76 4K Write 1.87 4K Mixed 0.2 88% 0.94 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 99.9% Great: 107%
WD My Book 25EE 8TB 12,029 User benchmarks, average bench 63% 2.5TB free, PID 25ee Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)	72.2% Very good	Read 168 Write 156 Mixed 150 201% 158 MB/s	4K Read 1.31 4K Write 4.41 4K Mixed 0.74 180% 2.15 MB/s
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 72.2% Great: 98%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL Ripjaws V DDR4 2400 C14 2x16GB 213 User benchmarks, average bench 74% 2 of 2 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)	83.3% Excellent	MC Read 30.9 MC Write 32.7 MC Mixed 25.7 85% 29.8 GB/s	SC Read 17.2 SC Write 30.5 SC Mixed 25.9 70% 24.5 GB/s	Latency 66.2 60% 66.2 ns
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 83.3% Great: 86%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical H270M-ITX/ac Builds (Compare 171 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 11%

Tree trunk

Desktop 67%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 10%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock H270M-ITX/ac

CPU
Core i5-7500Intel $89Bench 67%, 149,467 samples	27x
Core i7-7700Intel $167Bench 76%, 256,717 samples	25x
Core i5-7600KIntel $190Bench 76%, 195,006 samples	22x

GPU
HD 630 (Desktop Kaby Lake)IntelBench 5%, 153,031 samples	21x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	19x
GTX 1080Nvidia $195Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	13x

SSD
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $90Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	4x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GBSamsung $45Bench 199%, 240,629 samples	4x
MX300 SATA M.2 275GBCrucial $42Bench 80%, 16,792 samples	4x

RAM
Ripjaws V DDR4 2400 C15 2x8GBG.SKILL $31Bench 71%, 98,777 samples	10x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $45Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	8x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2400 C16 2x8GBCorsair $42Bench 76%, 105,447 samples	8x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 78% - Very good

Total price: $210

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16