Asus H97M-PLUS

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 24% Surfboard	Desktop 74% Battleship	Workstation 19% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	31.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asus H97M-PLUS (all builds)
Memory	6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20160222
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jun 24 '18 at 23:55
Run Duration	145 Seconds
Run User	GRC-User
Background CPU	17%

PC Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-4570-$99 129,272 User benchmarks, average bench 62% SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	74.7% Very good	Memory 80.7 1-Core 96.4 2-Core 198 71% 125 Pts	4-Core 397 8-Core 400 53% 399 Pts	64-Core 394 24% 394 Pts
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 74.7% Great: 72%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD R9 270X-$199 77,943 User benchmarks, average bench 27% Asus(1043 0464) CLim: 1120 MHz, MLim: 1400 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 18.6.1 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	31.3% Below average	Lighting 39.8 Reflection 36 Parallax 51.3 32% 42.4 fps	MRender 31.2 Gravity 33 Splatting 40 29% 34.7 fps
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 31.3% Great: 29%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 120GB-$80 69,224 User benchmarks, average bench 96% 30GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 98 98 6659 (0C) Power cycle count 94 94 5063 (B1) Unknown 94 94 123 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 53 44 47 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 99 99 2 (EB) Unknown 99 99 70 (F1) Unknown 99 99 30388679683
Poor: 64% Great: 115%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$70 337,642 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 31GB free Firmware: JC45 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 117 99 126927534 (03) Spinup time 100 100 0 (04) Start/Stop count 88 88 12694 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 87 60 4766231295 (09) Power-on hours count 85 85 13981 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 90 90 10434 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 97 97 3 (BC) Unknown 100 1 266292559871 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 59 46 99474473001 (C2) HDA temperature 41 54 60129542185 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 41 13 126927534 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 160 448322 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 77167677448095 (F1) Unknown 100 253 2350455375 (F2) Unknown 100 253 2759225665	41.1% Average	Read 75.4 Write 67.5 Mixed 82.1 57% 75 MB/s	4K Read 0.61 4K Write 1.44 4K Mixed 0.47 104% 0.84 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 41.1% Great: 68%
WD WD5000AVDS-63U7B1 500GB 24,608 User benchmarks, average bench 38% 9GB free Firmware: 01.00A01 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing below expectations (30^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 146 142 3683 (04) Start/Stop count 77 77 23074 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 253 0 (09) Power-on hours count 75 75 18808 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 89 89 11387 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 366 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 171 171 88604 (C2) HDA temperature 100 86 43 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 253 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 3817 (C8) Write error rate 100 253 0	32.7% Below average	Read 54 Write 59.6 Mixed 57.1 43% 56.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.45 4K Write 1.67 4K Mixed 0.29 82% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 32.7% Great: 52%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown OCZ3G13331G 1317 OCZ3G13331G 0215 CM3X2G1333C9 Kingston KHX1600C10D3/8G 8GB 7 User benchmarks, average bench 38% 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 1024, 1024, 2048, 4096 MB Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	50.4% Above average	MC Read 17.3 MC Write 18.7 MC Mixed 16.3 50% 17.4 GB/s	SC Read 12.3 SC Write 17.7 SC Mixed 16 44% 15.3 GB/s	Latency 79.3 50% 79.3 ns
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 50.4% Great: 50%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical H97M-PLUS Builds (Compare 974 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 66%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 8%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus H97M-PLUS - $140

CPU
Core i7-4790Intel $135Bench 71%, 255,027 samples	250x
Core i7-4790KIntel $348Bench 79%, 455,746 samples	120x
Core i5-4460Intel $194Bench 62%, 245,403 samples	109x

GPU
HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 230,189 samples	92x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	73x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	62x

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	43x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	31x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	27x

RAM
Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 54%, 77,652 samples	44x
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 59%, 122,541 samples	22x
CT102464BA160B.C16 2x8GBCrucialBench 55%, 11,058 samples	17x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 55% - Above average

Total price: $390

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16