COMPARE
GPU
RANKINGS
TEST
YOUR GPU
ADD TO PC
BUILD
Nvidia
AMD
VS
About
Effective Speed 
+6%
Real World Speed
Performance profile from 880,251 user samples
Benchmark your GPU here
678,188 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 56% Gigabyte(1458 366A)
Worst Bench: 44% Zotac(19DA 1366)
Poor: 44% Great: 56%
SPEED RANK: 90th / 665
202,063 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 55% Asus(1043 04FB)
Worst Bench: 35% MSI(1462 3413)
Poor: 35% Great: 55%
SPEED RANK: 92nd / 665
Effective 3D Speed
Effective 3D Gaming GPU Speed 		50.4 % Slightly faster effective speed.
+6% 		47.6 %
Average Score 
+10%
Lighting
Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat) 		61.7 fps Better lighting effects.
+10% 		56 fps
Reflection
Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot) 		71.8 fps Better reflection handling.
+20% 		60 fps
MRender
Avg. Render target array GShader (Sphere) 		68.1 fps Faster multi rendering.
+10% 		61.7 fps
Gravity
Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy) 		62.3 fps 62.8 fps +1%
Overclocked Score 
+11%
Lighting
Locally-deformable PRT (Bat) 		70 fps +4% 67.5 fps
Reflection
High dynamic range lighting (Teapot) 		83.3 fps Much better peak reflection handling.
+32% 		63.1 fps
MRender
Render target array GShader (Sphere) 		71.9 fps Faster peak multi rendering.
+10% 		65.3 fps
Gravity
NBody particle system (Galaxy) 		69.3 fps 71.4 fps +3%
Game FPS 
+2%
CSGO
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max 		156 Fps +1% 154 Fps
Fortnite
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max 		94 Fps +2% 92 Fps
PUBG
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max 		63 Fps Slightly Better PUBG Fps.
+6% 		59 Fps
GTAV
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max 		53 Fps 55 Fps +4%
LoL
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max 		156 Fps 160 Fps +2%
Overwatch
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max 		97 Fps +2% 95 Fps
BF1
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max 		62 Fps 75 Fps Better BF1 Fps.
+21%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max 		48 Fps 53 Fps Better The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt Fps.
+11%
Minecraft
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max 		189 Fps Better Minecraft Fps.
+19% 		158 Fps
DOTA 2
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max 		121 Fps 126 Fps +4%
WoW
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max 		63 Fps 68 Fps Slightly Better WoW Fps.
+7%
WoT
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max 		97 Fps 101 Fps +3%
Value & Sentiment 
+63%
Market Share
Based on 44,838,827 GPUs tested.
See market share leaders
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days) 		1.37 % Hugely higher market share.
+315% 		0.33 %
Value
Value For Money 		35.1 % 48.3 % Much better value.
+37%
User Rating
UBM User Rating 		70 % Slightly more popular.
+6% 		66 %
Price
Price (score) 		$340 $234 Much cheaper.
+31%
Nice To Haves 
+7%
Age
Newest 		82 Months 61 Months More recent.
+26%
Parallax
Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones) 		71 fps 91.9 fps Better peak texture detail.
+29%
Splatting
Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm) 		61 fps Much faster peak complex splatting.
+30% 		46.8 fps
Parallax
Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones) 		62.5 fps 80.8 fps Better texture detail.
+29%
Splatting
Avg. Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm) 		53.9 fps Faster complex splatting.
+21% 		44.6 fps
Conclusion 
Average Bench 50.4%
Average Bench 47.6%
ADVERTISEMENT

The Nvidia GTX 970 is a game changer in terms of performance per watt and value for money. The GTX 970 is based on Nvidia's ground-breaking Maxwell architecture which delivers considerable clock for clock performance gains over Kepler, its predecessor. Comparing the GTX 970 and 780 Ti shows that the two cards offer comparable performance yet the new GTX 970 costs nearly half as much! Unsurprisingly Nvidia are discontinuing the 780 Ti as it's now largely redundant. These price to performance gains typically occur once or twice a decade and although the new Maxwell architecture will improve down the line with the release of the Ti/Titan versions, at the moment the 970 offers the best value for money on the market by miles. Since this summary was originally written AMD have slashed prices and older Nvidia models (780/780 Ti/770) have also been hugely discounted. See the latest value for money rankings here. [Jul '15 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

The RX 480 is the first graphics card to feature AMD’s new 14nm Polaris architecture. The card is due for release on June 29 (in four days time). We don’t have all the details yet but the RX 480 is rumoured to have an MSRP of $199 and it will likely perform on a par with the Nvidia GTX 970. At present we only have one benchmark so although the performance figures are provisional the RX 480 and GTX 970 do appear to be closely matched. If further tests validate these results and the cards retail at the MSRP of $199, then the new RX 480 will effectively improve graphics card price/performance ratios by a whopping 23%, something that has not happened since the release of the Maxwell based Nvidia GTX 970 nearly two years ago. In addition to better price/performance for the current generation of games, the RX 480 also offers relatively strong DX12 support. [Jun '16 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

User Builds 
678,188
202,063
Custom PC Builder (Start a new build) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money.

CHOOSE A COMPONENT:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) July 2021 GPU Rankings.

We calculate effective 3D speed which estimates gaming performance for the top 12 games. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield value for money. Our figures are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. [GPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

Gaming Desktop ProGaming

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchMark.
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders.
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build.
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware.

 Frequently Asked Questions

Computer Components FAQ
What is the UBM value for money rating?
What is UBM Effective Speed?
Thunderbolt speed?
Are USB 3.0 cables different?
Graphics Cards
How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs?
What are the UBM DX11 GPU tests?
What are the UBM DX10 GPU tests?
What are the UBM DX09 GPU tests?
What is the Splatting GPU benchmark?
What is the Gravity (NBody) GPU benchmark?
What is the MRender GPU benchmark?
What is the parallax (POM) GPU benchmark?
What is the reflection (HDR) GPU benchmark?
What is the lighting (LDPRT) benchmark?
What is the GPU value for money rating?
What is the effective GPU speed index?
ALL FAQs »

 Best User Rated
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-11600K $270Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-11400F $260Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $400Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
Intel Core i7-11700K $380Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $184
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $79SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $34Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $80SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback