Real World Speed
Performance profile from 243,410 user samples
136,640 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 86% Gigabyte(1458 36B6)
Worst Bench: 69% Gainward(10B0 17C8) ≥ 4GB
Poor: 69% Great: 86%
SPEED RANK: 32nd / 627
106,770 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 66% MSI(1462 3170)
Worst Bench: 54% MSI(1462 3170)
Poor: 54% Great: 66%
SPEED RANK: 50th / 627
Effective 3D Speed
Effective 3D Gaming GPU Speed
79 % Much faster effective speed.
+31%
60.3 %
Lighting
Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
319 fps Much better lighting effects.
+33%
239 fps
MRender
Avg. Render target array GShader (Sphere)
195 fps Faster multi rendering.
+18%
165 fps
Gravity
Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy)
292 fps Much faster NBody calculation.
+34%
218 fps
Lighting
Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
368 fps Much better peak lighting effects.
+35%
273 fps
MRender
Render target array GShader (Sphere)
211 fps Faster peak multi rendering.
+19%
177 fps
Gravity
NBody particle system (Galaxy)
319 fps Much faster peak NBody calculation.
+32%
241 fps
CSGO
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
196 fps Slightly Better CSGO Fps.
+7%
183 fps
Fortnite
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
121 fps Slightly Better Fortnite Fps.
+15%
105 fps
PUBG
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
81 fps Better PUBG Fps.
+15%
70 fps
GTAV
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
80 fps Much Better GTAV Fps.
+31%
61 fps
LoL
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
215 fps Slightly Better LoL Fps.
+13%
191 fps
Overwatch
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
115 fps Slightly Better Overwatch Fps.
+10%
104 fps
BF1
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
98 fps Much Better BF1 Fps.
+32%
74 fps
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
82 fps Much Better The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt Fps.
+35%
60 fps
Minecraft
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
244 fps Better Minecraft Fps.
+17%
207 fps
DOTA 2
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
153 fps Slightly Better DOTA 2 Fps.
+13%
136 fps
WoW
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
91 fps Better WoW Fps.
+21%
75 fps
WoT
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
121 fps Slightly Better WoT Fps.
+9%
111 fps
Market Share
Based on 22,405,282 GPUs tested.
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
0.45 % 0.53 % Higher market share.
+18%
Value
Value For Money
39 % Much better value.
+36%
28.6 %
User Rating
UBM User Rating
106 % Slightly more popular.
+6%
100 %
Price
Price (score)
$480 +4% $500
Age
Newest
55 Months Slightly more recent.
+13%
63 Months
Reflection
High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
317 fps Much better peak reflection handling.
+35%
235 fps
Parallax
Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
375 fps Much better peak texture detail.
+39%
270 fps
Splatting
Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
224 fps Much faster peak complex splatting.
+35%
166 fps
Reflection
Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
288 fps Much better reflection handling.
+35%
213 fps
Parallax
Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
330 fps Much better texture detail.
+38%
239 fps
Splatting
Avg. Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
197 fps Much faster complex splatting.
+32%
149 fps
ADVERTISEMENT

The new GTX 980 Ti shares the same board as the more expensive Titan-X but with various restrictions including a reduced number of CUDA cores (3072 to 2816, -8.3%). Although the 980 Ti has the same 384-bit memory bandwidth as the Titan-X it only has 6GB of GDDR5 vs. 12GB in the Titan-X. So far we only have one user benchmark from a pre-release unit of the GTX 980 Ti so the following benchmarks are provisional. Comparing the Titan-X and 980 Ti shows that the Ti only lags by around 8%, which is in line with the CUDA core counts on the two cards. On the other hand comparing the GTX 980 and GTX 980 Ti shows that the Ti is around 16% faster. We don't have reliable prices for the GTX 980 Ti yet so a precise value rating isn't possible but as a card aimed at resolutions greater than 1080p it will struggle to match the GTX 970 for the vast majority of users. [May '15 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

The Nvidia GTX 980 is the new top end Maxwell based Nvidia GPU. The Maxwell architecture offers significantly higher clock for clock performance when compared to Kepler based cards from the previous generation. Comparing the GTX 980 and GTX 970 shows that the 970 only lags by around 17% in terms of performance but it's priced nearly 40% lower making the GTX 970 far better value for money card. Even though the GTX 970 beats the 980 in terms of value, the 980 still destroys previous generation cards. Comparing the GTX 980 and 780 Ti shows that the Newer 980 offers around 14% better performance at a 25% price discount. Nvidia have changed the price/performance landscape with their new Maxwell architecture and now pose a serious threat to AMDs high end GPU market share. The new GTX 980/970 cards replace the now discontinued GTX 780 Ti, 780 and 770. [Sep '14 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) December 2019 GPU Rankings.

We calculate effective 3D speed which estimates gaming performance for the top 12 games. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield value for money. Our figures are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. [GPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchMark.
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders.
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build.
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware.
  • - Share your opinion by voting.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9400F $150Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $270Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-9600K $200AMD RX 590 $180Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $150
Intel Core i7-9700K $359Nvidia RTX 2060 $324Samsung 850 Pro 512GB $230
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $65SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $38Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $63SanDisk Extreme 32GB $46
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $613SanDisk Extreme 16GB $24
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback