Today's hottest deals
CSGO
Dust 2 1080p Max
280 EFps Better CSGO EFps.
+17%
240 EFps
GTAV
Franklin & Lamar 1080p Max
110 EFps Much Better GTAV EFps.
+67%
66 EFps
Overwatch
Temple of Anubis 1080p Max
138 EFps Much Better Overwatch EFps.
+79%
77 EFps
PUBG
M249 Training 1080p Max
135 EFps Much Better PUBG EFps.
+69%
80 EFps
Fortnite
UserBenchmark Island 1080p Max
133 EFps Much Better Fortnite EFps.
+43%
93 EFps
Real World Speed
Performance profile from 499,725 user samples
319,148 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 106% Nvidia(10DE 13A3) ≥ 4GB
Worst Bench: 90% Gigabyte(1458 3FF1)
Poor: 90% Great: 106%
SPEED RANK: 65th / 713
180,577 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 62% MSI(1462 8D95)
Worst Bench: 53% Gigabyte(1458 401A)
Poor: 53% Great: 62%
SPEED RANK: 114th / 713
Effective 3D Speed
Effective 3D Gaming GPU Speed
99.8 % Much faster effective speed.
+70%
58.7 %
Lighting
Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
121 fps Much better lighting effects.
+59%
76.2 fps
Reflection
Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
117 fps Much better reflection handling.
+47%
79.5 fps
MRender
Avg. Render target array GShader (Sphere)
175 fps Hugely faster multi rendering.
+181%
62.3 fps
Gravity
Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy)
112 fps Much faster NBody calculation.
+56%
71.9 fps
Lighting
Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
132 fps Much better peak lighting effects.
+62%
81.5 fps
Reflection
High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
168 fps Much better peak reflection handling.
+57%
107 fps
MRender
Render target array GShader (Sphere)
187 fps Hugely faster peak multi rendering.
+182%
66.4 fps
Gravity
NBody particle system (Galaxy)
119 fps Much faster peak NBody calculation.
+56%
76.3 fps
Market Share
Based on 68,748,274 GPUs tested
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
0.84 % Hugely higher market share.
+95%
0.43 %
Value
Value For Money
87.6 % Hugely better value.
+86%
47.1 %
User Rating
UBM User Rating
83 % 86 % +4%
Price
Price (score)
$270 Slightly cheaper.
+8%
$295
Age
Newest
64 Months 60 Months Slightly more recent.
+6%
Parallax
Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
140 fps Much better peak texture detail.
+74%
80.5 fps
Splatting
Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
108 fps Much faster peak complex splatting.
+72%
62.8 fps
Parallax
Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
124 fps Much better texture detail.
+70%
72.9 fps
Splatting
Avg. Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
102 fps Much faster complex splatting.
+76%
58.1 fps

Nvidia’s RTX 2060 Super GPU is a refreshed version of their RTX 2060 launched just 10 months prior. With this iteration, NVIDIA are hoping to contest AMD’s recent RX 5700 and RX 5700 XT with a better value proposition than compared to the 2060. The RTX 2060 Super uses the same GPU die as in the 2060, but has extra CUDA cores (increasing from 1920 to 2176) and 8 GB of GDDR6 memory (up from 6 GB), capable of delivering 448 GB/s of memory bandwidth. It has a has a TDP of 175 W, compared to 160 W in the 2060. The RTX 2060S also features Turing NVENC which is far more efficient than CPU encoding and alleviates the need for casual streamers to use a dedicated stream PC. The 15-20% increase in effective speed from the 2060 to 2060 Super costs around $50 on reference price tags. For now Nvidia will retain the "not-Super" RTX 2060 as the most affordable GPU in the ray-tracing 2000 series at $350 USD. [Jul '19 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

The Nvidia GTX 1650 Super features 12Gbps GDDR6 up from 8Gbps of GDDR5 on the “not super” GTX 1650. With a launch price of just $160 the 1650S is aimed squarely at AMD’s 500 series cards. Comparing the GTX 1650S and the RX 590 shows that the 590 leads by 3% but the 1650S is around 10% cheaper. The 1650S has a TDP of 100W which is 50% lower than a typical AMD 500 series card. With a lower TDP, the 1650S requires a less demanding thermal solution and therefore runs a lot quieter. Nvidia’s top value offering prior to the 1650S was the $70 more expensive 1660S which is around 18% faster but also 40% more expensive than the 1650S. Although the 1650S promises to shake up, if not dominate, the value end of the GPU market, street prices are ultimately king. Further price cuts could, once again, bring AMD’s 500 series back into the game. [Nov '19 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) November 2024 GPU Rankings

We calculate effective 3D speed which estimates gaming performance for the top 12 games. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield value for money. Our figures are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. [GPUPro]

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC
  • - See speed test results from other users
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $167Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback