Average Bench: 37.9% (151st of 714)

Based on 3,536 user benchmarks.  Device: 10DE 1F95 Model: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti with Max-Q Design

Poor average bench

The Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650 Ti with Max-Q Design averaged 62.1% lower than the peak scores attained by the group leaders. This isn't a great result which indicates that there are much faster alternatives on the comparison list.

Strengths

Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat) 47fps
Avg. Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm) 42.9fps

Very good consistency

The range of scores (95th - 5th percentile) for the Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650 Ti with Max-Q Design is just 14.8%. This is a relatively narrow range which indicates that the Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650 Ti with Max-Q Design performs reasonably consistently under varying real world conditions.

Weaknesses

Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot) 56.1fps
Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones) 45.1fps
ADVERTISEMENT

Average Bench

(Based on 3,536 samples)
Min Avg Max
30 Lighting 47 55.1
30 Reflection 56.1 76.9
35.8 Parallax 45.1 51
38.3% 49.4 fps
Min Avg Max
47.4 MRender 50.8 53.5
36.7 Gravity 43.2 49.3
37.6 Splatting 42.9 47.6
37% 45.6 fps
User Benchmarks Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
The fastest GPU (mainstream) averages a speed of 100%
MSI(1462 12BD) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 31.0.15.5222
Lighting 60.6
Reflection 65.4
Parallax 53.5
49% 59.8 fps
MRender 52.4
Gravity 55.2
Splatting 51
43% 52.9 fps
HP(103C 86E8) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 2500 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 552.12
Lighting 47.7
Reflection 57
Parallax 47.4
39% 50.7 fps
MRender 53
Gravity 44.3
Splatting 44.8
38% 47.4 fps
HP(103C 86E7) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 2500 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 551.86
Lighting 48.3
Reflection 56.4
Parallax 44.2
39% 49.6 fps
MRender 51.8
Gravity 41.2
Splatting 41.7
36% 44.9 fps
Legend(17AA 3F95) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 27.21.14.6230
Lighting 45.2
Reflection 53.9
Parallax 44.1
37% 47.7 fps
MRender 51.4
Gravity 42.3
Splatting 42
37% 45.2 fps
Asus(1043 1E1F) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 31.0.15.5222
Lighting 41.9
Reflection 58.8
Parallax 35.1
34% 45.3 fps
MRender 50
Gravity 42
Splatting 41.5
36% 44.5 fps
Acer(1025 1479) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 31.0.15.5222
Lighting 32.7
Reflection 7.9
Parallax 32.3
27% 24.3 fps
MRender 50.9
Gravity 40.4
Splatting 40.5
36% 43.9 fps
Legend(17AA 3F95) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 27.21.14.6230
Lighting 30
Reflection 53.6
Parallax 43.7
24% 42.4 fps
MRender 51.3
Gravity 41.6
Splatting 42.3
36% 45.1 fps
Asus(1043 1E1F) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 31.0.15.5123
Lighting 3.9
Reflection 25.5
Parallax 19.7
3% 16.4 fps
MRender 30.7
Gravity 31.6
Splatting 29.9
25% 30.7 fps
3,536 MORE »

 Market Share (See Leaders)

The number of benchmark samples for this model as a percentage of all 67,457,966 GPUs tested

 Popular Cards (based on 3,536 benchmarks)

If you buy via one of these links, our site may earn a commission

Hardware Id Samples Bench ± SD Model / Price
MSI(1462 12BD) 24% 38% ± 4%
Legend(17AA 22C0) 13% 39% ± 3%
HP(103C 86E8) 9% 36% ± 3%
Legend(17AA 22C1) 6% 39% ± 4%
Device(1A58 1003) 6% 38% ± 4%
Legend(17AA 3F95) 6% 41% ± 5%
Device(1A58 1006) 5% 37% ± 4%
HP(103C 8815) 5% 36% ± 3%
Asus(1043 1E1F) 5% 39% ± 5%
Asus(1043 1DFF) 5% 37% ± 2%
HP(103C 86E7) 4% 36% ± 3%
MSI(1462 12D2) 3% 37% ± 3%
Legend(17AA 3837) 3% 40% ± 3%
Device(1A58 1007) 2% 36% ± 5%
MSI(1462 12C5) 1% 34% ± 6%
Acer(1025 1479) 1% 37% ± 2%
Sanyo(144D C838) 1% 41% ± 1%
Acer(1025 147B) 0% 29% ± 0%
Send price feedback
Typical GeForce GTX 1650 Ti with Max-Q Design Builds (Compare 2,929 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 32%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

Motherboard: MSI MS-16R4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Popular GeForce GTX 1650 Ti with Max-Q Design compatible motherboards:

How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC
  • - See speed test results from other users
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware
Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) April 2024 GPU Rankings

We calculate effective 3D speed which estimates gaming performance for the top 12 games. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield value for money. Our figures are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. [GPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.

 Comments

Added n/a ago.

Good (edit your comment) Add link

3 years ago.

The fastest GPU currently for 35W and will be great in an ultraportable device. If you are after the best performance however, this ain't it. Only recommended if you value portability in a laptop and you still want to game on the go for a maximum of 4-5 hours.


Good

3 years ago.

Very good basic gpu for laptops


Good

2 years ago.

Very good for laptops. Power efficient with acceptable 1080p gaming performance. Don't expect to use it under full load as it downclocks after a few minutes of full load due to power management.


Your
opinion?
714 Graphics Cards (Compared) Thousands of user benchmarks compiled into one comparison list

See how consistently different GPUs perform with varying real world conditions. The charts also illustrate overall performance, popularity and rank.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback