Average Bench: 58.5% (58th of 642)

Based on 1,442 user benchmarks.  Device: 10DE 1BE1 Model: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design

Average average bench

The Nvidia GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design averaged 41.4% lower than the peak scores attained by the group leaders. This isn't a great result which indicates that there are much faster alternatives on the comparison list.


Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat) 208fps
Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy) 215fps

Above average consistency

The range of scores (95th - 5th percentile) for the Nvidia GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design is 32.2%. This is a relatively narrow range which indicates that the Nvidia GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design performs reasonably consistently under varying real world conditions.


Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot) 215fps
Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones) 225fps

Average Bench

(Based on 1,442 samples)
Min Avg Max
30 Lighting 208 259
30 Reflection 215 264
126 Parallax 225 276
54.7% 216 fps
Min Avg Max
25.3 MRender 153 185
140 Gravity 215 250
127 Splatting 175 198
59% 181 fps
User Benchmarks Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
The fastest GPU (mainstream) averages a speed of 100%
HP(103C 84DB) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1544 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 456.38
Lighting 274
Reflection 270
Parallax 303
72% 282 fps
MRender 187
Gravity 261
Splatting 196
72% 215 fps
HP(103C 84DB) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1544 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 456.38
Lighting 237
Reflection 256
Parallax 243
62% 245 fps
MRender 172
Gravity 227
Splatting 190
63% 196 fps
HP(103C 84DB) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1544 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 456.38
Lighting 231
Reflection 240
Parallax 257
61% 243 fps
MRender 177
Gravity 222
Splatting 181
62% 193 fps
1,442 MORE »

 Market Share (See Leaders)

The number of benchmark samples for this model as a percentage of all 33,000,655 GPUs tested.

 Popular Cards

Based on statistics from 1,442 user benchmarks.

Hardware Id Samples Bench ± SD Model / Price
HP(103C 84DB) 90% 58% ± 11%
Asus(1043 16F0) 10% 62% ± 11%
Send price feedback
Typical GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design Builds (Compare 3,187 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming 48%
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation 41%
Speed boat

System: HP OMEN by HP Laptop 15-dc0xxx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 45% - Average Total price: $45

Popular GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design systems:

How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchMark.
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders.
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build.
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware.
  • - Share your opinion by voting.
Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) September 2020 GPU Rankings.

We calculate effective 3D speed which estimates gaming performance for the top 12 games. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield value for money. Our figures are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. [GPUPro]


Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.


Added n/a ago.


2 years ago.

1070 Max-Q better card than 1080 Max-Q for many reasons. Here are some facts. 1060 Max-Q is 11% slower than 1060 Mobile but 53% faster than 1050ti Mobile. 1070 Max-Q is 18% slower than 1070 Mobile but 25% faster than 1060 Mobile. 1080 Max-Q is 12% slower than 1080 Mobile but 0% faster than 1070 Mobile. 1080 Max-Q is only GPU that is not faster than its lower tier mobile GPU. 1080 Max-Q is 18% faster than 1070 Max-Q 1070 Max-Q is 52% faster than 1060 Max-Q 1070 Max-Q has much higher performance jump from its lower tier Max-Q card. Based on Asus Zephyrus GX501VI and GX501VS reviews, 1080 Max-Q temperature goes up to 80°C on load, whereas 1070 Max-Q temperature goes up to 70°C on load. In which it gives 1070 Max-Q a headroom to overclock, reducing performance difference with 1070 mobile and 1080 Max-Q, while 1080 Max-Q will throttle if overclocked. To conclude Due to the nature of 1080's high TGP, Max-Q version of 1080 has worst efficiency, performing much like a 1070 card. 1070 Max-Q a smarter choice for the Max-Q Laptop for its performance efficiency and better acoustic.

642 Graphics Cards (Compared) Thousands of user benchmarks compiled into one comparison list.

See how consistently different GPUs perform with varying real world conditions. The charts also illustrate overall performance, popularity and rank.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
Intel Core i5-9600K $193Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $230Crucial MX500 250GB $43
Intel Core i5-9400F $145Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super) $170Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i7-9700K $300Nvidia RTX 2070S (Super) $500Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $43
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $43Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $66SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $64SanDisk Extreme 32GB $30
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649SanDisk Extreme 16GB $28
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback