Average Bench: 58.7% (50th of 630)

Based on 1,063 user benchmarks.  Device: 10DE 1BE1 Model: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design

Average average bench

The Nvidia GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design averaged 41.2% lower than the peak scores attained by the group leaders. This isn't a great result which indicates that there are much faster alternatives on the comparison list.

Strengths

Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat) 207fps
Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy) 216fps

Above average consistency

The range of scores (95th - 5th percentile) for the Nvidia GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design is 30.4%. This is a relatively narrow range which indicates that the Nvidia GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design performs reasonably consistently under varying real world conditions.

Weaknesses

Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot) 216fps
Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones) 225fps
ADVERTISEMENT

Average Bench

(Based on 1,063 samples)
Min Avg Max
30 Lighting 207 260
30.1 Reflection 216 264
130 Parallax 225 278
54.3% 216 fps
Min Avg Max
25.9 MRender 153 184
141 Gravity 216 251
130 Splatting 175 198
59.2% 181 fps
User Benchmarks Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
The fastest GPU (mainstream) averages a speed of 100%
HP(103C 84DB) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1544 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 430.86
Lighting 235
Reflection 255
Parallax 279
62% 256 fps
MRender 176
Gravity 237
Splatting 188
66% 200 fps
HP(103C 84DB) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1544 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 430.86
Lighting 242
Reflection 253
Parallax 246
64% 247 fps
MRender 180
Gravity 234
Splatting 189
65% 201 fps
HP(103C 84DB) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1544 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 430.86
Lighting 222
Reflection 241
Parallax 259
58% 241 fps
MRender 178
Gravity 230
Splatting 189
64% 199 fps
HP(103C 84DB) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1544 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 430.86
Lighting 144
Reflection 148
Parallax 249
38% 180 fps
MRender 167
Gravity 232
Splatting 177
64% 192 fps
HP(103C 84DB) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1544 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 430.86
Lighting 165
Reflection 177
Parallax 140
43% 161 fps
MRender 26.4
Gravity 174
Splatting 141
41% 114 fps
HP(103C 84DB) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1544 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 441.87
Lighting 30
Reflection 30
Parallax 143
8% 67.7 fps
MRender 23.9
Gravity 171
Splatting 130
40% 108 fps
HP(103C 84DB) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1544 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 441.87
Lighting 91.7
Reflection 137
Parallax 42.5
24% 90.5 fps
MRender 72.3
Gravity 37.9
Splatting 52.2
14% 54.1 fps
1,063 MORE »

 Market Share (See Leaders)

The number of benchmark samples for this model as a percentage of all 23,625,019 GPUs tested.

 Popular Cards

Based on statistics from 1,063 user benchmarks.

Hardware Id Samples Bench ± SD Model / Price
HP(103C 84DB) 88% 58% ± 11%
Asus(1043 16F0) 12% 64% ± 7%
Send price feedback
Typical GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design Builds (Compare 7,356 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 59%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 61%
Destroyer

System: HP OMEN by HP Laptop 15-dc0xxx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 36% - Below average Total price: $60

Popular GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design systems:

How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchMark.
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders.
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build.
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware.
  • - Share your opinion by voting.
Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) January 2020 GPU Rankings.

We calculate effective 3D speed which estimates gaming performance for the top 12 games. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield value for money. Our figures are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. [GPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.

 Comments

Added n/a ago.

Excellent

24 months ago.

1070 Max-Q better card than 1080 Max-Q for many reasons. Here are some facts. 1060 Max-Q is 11% slower than 1060 Mobile but 53% faster than 1050ti Mobile. 1070 Max-Q is 18% slower than 1070 Mobile but 25% faster than 1060 Mobile. 1080 Max-Q is 12% slower than 1080 Mobile but 0% faster than 1070 Mobile. 1080 Max-Q is only GPU that is not faster than its lower tier mobile GPU. 1080 Max-Q is 18% faster than 1070 Max-Q 1070 Max-Q is 52% faster than 1060 Max-Q 1070 Max-Q has much higher performance jump from its lower tier Max-Q card. Based on Asus Zephyrus GX501VI and GX501VS reviews, 1080 Max-Q temperature goes up to 80°C on load, whereas 1070 Max-Q temperature goes up to 70°C on load. In which it gives 1070 Max-Q a headroom to overclock, reducing performance difference with 1070 mobile and 1080 Max-Q, while 1080 Max-Q will throttle if overclocked. To conclude Due to the nature of 1080's high TGP, Max-Q version of 1080 has worst efficiency, performing much like a 1070 card. 1070 Max-Q a smarter choice for the Max-Q Laptop for its performance efficiency and better acoustic.


Your
opinion?
630 Graphics Cards (Compared) Thousands of user benchmarks compiled into one comparison list.

See how consistently different GPUs perform with varying real world conditions. The charts also illustrate overall performance, popularity and rank.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9600K $205Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-9400F $150Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super) $160Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i7-9700K $375Nvidia RTX 2060 $349Samsung 850 Pro 512GB $249
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $80SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $63SanDisk Extreme 32GB $46
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $653SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $14
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback