TEST
YOUR GPU
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Nvidia

Quadro P2000

▲ 504 ▼

Release date ≈ Q2 2018.

Average Bench: 27.6% (176th of 715)

Based on 4,738 user benchmarks.  Device: 10DE 1CBA Model: NVIDIA Quadro P2000
Poor: 23%Average: 27.6% Great: 31%

Popular builds with this GPU

Very poor average bench

The Nvidia Quadro P2000 averaged 72.3% lower than the peak scores attained by the group leaders. This isn't a great result which indicates that there are much faster alternatives on the comparison list.

Strengths

Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat) 34.9fps
Avg. Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm) 29.7fps

Excellent consistency

The range of scores (95th - 5th percentile) for the Nvidia Quadro P2000 is just 8.04%. This is an extremely narrow range which indicates that the Nvidia Quadro P2000 performs superbly consistently under varying real world conditions.

Weaknesses

Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot) 36.7fps
Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones) 33.5fps
ADVERTISEMENT

Average Bench

(Based on 4,738 samples)
Rank 17627.6%
Min Avg Max
28.1 Lighting 34.9 40.1
33.8 Reflection 36.7 42.5
26.9 Parallax 33.5 37.6
28.5% 35 fps
Min Avg Max
26.8 MRender 31.5 33.2
26.3 Gravity 34.9 38.7
25.3 Splatting 29.7 31.8
26.1% 32 fps
User Benchmarks Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
The fastest GPU (mainstream) averages a speed of 100%
Dell(1028 0831) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 31.0.15.3827
30.8% Below average
Lighting 39.8
Reflection 37.6
Parallax 35.6
32% 37.7 fps
MRender 32.7
Gravity 38.3
Splatting 31.4
28% 34.1 fps
Legend(17AA 2262) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1607 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 442.19
30.8% Below average
Lighting 39.7
Reflection 37.4
Parallax 35
32% 37.4 fps
MRender 32.1
Gravity 38.4
Splatting 31.5
28% 34 fps
Legend(17AA 225F) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1607 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 551.86
30.7% Below average
Lighting 39.7
Reflection 36.9
Parallax 35
32% 37.2 fps
MRender 32.3
Gravity 37.6
Splatting 31.7
28% 33.9 fps
Legend(17AA 225F) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1607 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 551.86
30.5% Below average
Lighting 39.3
Reflection 37.1
Parallax 35.2
32% 37.2 fps
MRender 32.1
Gravity 37.8
Splatting 31.3
27% 33.7 fps
HP(103C 842C) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1607 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 529.19
29.6% Poor
Lighting 38.1
Reflection 36.1
Parallax 34.6
31% 36.3 fps
MRender 32.4
Gravity 36.6
Splatting 30.4
27% 33.1 fps
Dell(1028 087D) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 31.0.15.4659
25.9% Poor
Lighting 31.5
Reflection 35.7
Parallax 34
26% 33.7 fps
MRender 32.9
Gravity 35
Splatting 29.8
26% 32.6 fps
Dell(1028 1831) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1607 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 536.45
25.2% Poor
Lighting 31.2
Reflection 35.8
Parallax 32.6
25% 33.2 fps
MRender 27.1
Gravity 33.1
Splatting 30.1
25% 30.1 fps
Dell(1028 087D) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 32.0.15.5599
25% Poor
Lighting 30.1
Reflection 39.7
Parallax 30
24% 33.3 fps
MRender 32.1
Gravity 34.4
Splatting 29.7
26% 32.1 fps
Dell(1028 087D) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 32.0.15.5599
23.9% Poor
Lighting 28
Reflection 35.7
Parallax 33.7
23% 32.5 fps
MRender 32.7
Gravity 33.7
Splatting 29.3
26% 31.9 fps
4,738 MORE »

 Market Share (See Leaders)

The number of benchmark samples for this model as a percentage of all 68,016,284 GPUs tested

 Popular Cards (based on 4,738 benchmarks)

If you buy via one of these links, our site may earn a commission

Hardware Id Samples Bench ± SD Model / Price
Hide stale prices
Dell(1028 087D) 23% 25% ± 2%
Dell(1028 0831) 17% 30% ± 2%
HP(103C 842A) 17% 28% ± 3%
Legend(17AA 225F) 9% 30% ± 2%
HP(103C 842C) 8% 27% ± 4%
Legend(17AA 2262) 6% 29% ± 3%
HP(103C 8451) 4% 24% ± 3%
Dell(1028 1831) 4% 29% ± 3%
HP(103C 8427) 3% 25% ± 2%
HP(103C 844F) 3% 26% ± 3%
HP(103C 842F) 2% 29% ± 2%
Legend(17AA 2269) 1% 30% ± 1%
MSI(1462 1219) 1% 29% ± 0%
HP(103C 842D) 1% 30% ± 1%
MSI(1462 1216) 1% 30% ± 1%
MSI(1462 121A) 0% 29% ± 0%
HP(103C 8429) 0% 24% ± 0%
Legend(17AA 2268) 0% 29% ± 3%
Send price feedback
Custom PC Builder (Start a new build) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE A COMPONENT:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical Quadro P2000 Builds (Compare 1,385 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 28%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 25%
Surfboard

System: HP ZBook 15 G5

CPU
Core i7-8850HIntelBench 71%, 20,669 samples925x
Core i7-8750HIntelBench 70%, 442,631 samples271x
Xeon E-2176MIntelBench 77%, 4,000 samples90x
GPU
Quadro P2000NvidiaBench 28%, 4,738 samples427x
SSD
MZVLB512HAJQ-000H1 512GBSamsungBench 209%, 20,750 samples339x
XG5 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBToshiba  $33Bench 145%, 33,719 samples137x
MZVLB512HAJQ-000H7 512GBSamsungBench 183%, 2,021 samples67x
RAM
M471A2K43CB1-CTD 2x16GBSamsungBench 82%, 20,439 samples180x
M471A2K43DB1-CTD 2x16GBSamsungBench 81%, 4,980 samples91x
M471A2K43CB1-CTD 1x16GBSamsungBench 44%, 44,819 samples86x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Popular Quadro P2000 systems:

How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

Gaming Desktop ProGaming

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC
  • - See speed test results from other users
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware
Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) July 2024 GPU Rankings

We calculate effective 3D speed which estimates gaming performance for the top 12 games. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield value for money. Our figures are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. [GPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.

 Comments

Added n/a ago.
Your
opinion?
▲Like ▼Dislike
Ready to retire
Age: 6 years

Speed Comparisons

vs Nvidia RTX 4060
vs Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti
vs Nvidia RTX 4070
vs Nvidia RTX 3060
vs Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti
vs Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super)
vs Nvidia RTX 4070-Ti
vs Nvidia RTX 3070
vs Nvidia RTX 4090

715 Graphics Cards (Compared) Thousands of user benchmarks compiled into one comparison list

See how consistently different GPUs perform with varying real world conditions. The charts also illustrate overall performance, popularity and rank.

 Frequently Asked Questions

Computer Components FAQ
What is the UBM value for money rating?
What is UBM Effective Speed?
Thunderbolt speed?
Are USB 3.0 cables different?
Graphics Cards
How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs?
What are the UBM DX11 GPU tests?
What are the UBM DX10 GPU tests?
What are the UBM DX09 GPU tests?
What is the Splatting GPU benchmark?
What is the Gravity (NBody) GPU benchmark?
What is the MRender GPU benchmark?
What is the parallax (POM) GPU benchmark?
What is the reflection (HDR) GPU benchmark?
What is the lighting (LDPRT) benchmark?
What is the GPU value for money rating?
What is the effective GPU speed index?
ALL FAQs »

 Best User Rated
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $85
Intel Core i5-13600K $235Nvidia RTX 4070 $499Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $342
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback