Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
TEST
YOUR GPU
ADD TO PC
BUILD

ATI

Radeon HD 2600-PRO

▲ 5060 ▼

Release date ≤ Q2 2014.

Average Bench: 1.21% (599th of 713)

Based on 190 user benchmarks.  Device: 1002 9589 Model: ATI Radeon HD 2600 PRO
Poor: 1%Average: 1.21% Great: 1%

Popular builds with this GPU

Terrible average bench

The ATI Radeon HD 2600-PRO averaged 98.7% lower than the peak scores attained by the group leaders. This isn't a great result which indicates that there are much faster alternatives on the comparison list.

Strengths

Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat) 1.45fps
Avg. Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm) 2.17fps

Excellent consistency

The range of scores (95th - 5th percentile) for the ATI Radeon HD 2600-PRO is just 0.65%. This is an extremely narrow range which indicates that the ATI Radeon HD 2600-PRO performs superbly consistently under varying real world conditions.

Weaknesses

Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot) 2.28fps
Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones) 0.87fps

Average Bench

(Based on 190 samples)
Rank 5991.21%
Min Avg Max
0.07 Lighting 1.45 1.8
1.56 Reflection 2.28 3.65
0.36 Parallax 0.87 1.27
1.17% 1.53 fps
Min Avg Max
0.94 MRender 1.78 2.26
0.3 Gravity 0.8 0.96
0.9 Splatting 2.17 3.65
1.33% 1.58 fps
User Benchmarks Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
The fastest GPU (mainstream) averages a speed of 100%
Gigabyte(1458 2180) 512MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 8.970.100.9001
1.78% Terrible
Lighting 1.9
Reflection 1.6
Parallax 0.5
2% 1.33 fps
MRender 2
Gravity 0.9
Splatting 4.5
2% 2.47 fps
PwrHis(1787 3000) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 8.970.100.9001
1.63% Terrible
Lighting 1.9
Reflection 2.2
Parallax 1
2% 1.7 fps
MRender 2
Gravity 0.4
Splatting 3.6
2% 2 fps
Sapphire(174B E410) 512MB
Driver: atiumd64.dll Ver. 8.632.1.2000
1.61% Terrible
Lighting 1.8
Reflection 2.2
Parallax 1.1
2% 1.7 fps
MRender 2.3
Gravity 0.9
Splatting 3.3
2% 2.17 fps
Asus(1043 01BC) 256MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 8.970.100.9001
1.54% Terrible
Lighting 1.4
Reflection 2.1
Parallax 0.9
1% 1.47 fps
MRender 2.1
Gravity 1
Splatting 4.6
2% 2.57 fps
Sapphire(174B E410) 512MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 8.97.10.6
1.53% Terrible
Lighting 1.7
Reflection 2.2
Parallax 0.7
1% 1.53 fps
MRender 2.1
Gravity 0.9
Splatting 3.2
2% 2.07 fps
MSI(1462 0930) 256MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 8.970.100.7000
1.4% Terrible
Lighting 1.6
Reflection 1.6
Parallax 0.7
1% 1.3 fps
MRender 1.9
Gravity 0.9
Splatting 2.7
2% 1.83 fps
Sapphire(174B E410) 512MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 8.970.100.9001
1.36% Terrible
Lighting 1.4
Reflection 2.9
Parallax 0.5
1% 1.6 fps
MRender 2.1
Gravity 0.7
Splatting 3.3
2% 2.03 fps
Asus(1043 01D0) 512MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 8.970.100.9001
1.32% Terrible
Lighting 1.7
Reflection 2.4
Parallax 0.5
1% 1.53 fps
MRender 2
Gravity 0.5
Splatting 1.8
1% 1.43 fps
190 MORE »

 Market Share (See Leaders)

The number of benchmark samples for this model as a percentage of all 68,726,909 GPUs tested

 Popular Cards (based on 190 benchmarks)

If you buy via one of these links, our site may earn a commission

Hardware Id Samples Bench ± SD Model / Price
Hide stale prices
PwrHis(1787 3000) 20% 1% ± 0%
Sapphire(174B E410) 19% 1% ± 0%
MSI(1462 0930) 14% 1% ± 0%
Asus(1043 01D0) 10% 1% ± 0%
PwrHis(1787 2233) 9% 1% ± 0%
Asus(1043 01BC) 6% 1% ± 0%
Device(0000 0000) 6% 1% ± 0%
Sapphire(174B 0E41) 4% 1% ± 0%
Device(18BC 3338) 3% 1% ± 0%
Gigabyte(1458 2180) 3% 1% ± 0%
Device(17AF 2002) 1% 1% ± 0%
PwrHis(1787 0589) 1% 1% ± 0%
Diamond(1092 0632) 1% 1% ± 0%
Device(1642 3726) 1% 1% ± 0%
Device(18BC 3692) 1% 1% ± 0%
Send price feedback
Custom PC Builder (Start a new build) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE A COMPONENT:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical Radeon HD 2600-PRO Builds (Compare 191 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 39%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: HP xw4600 Workstation

CPU
Core2 Quad Q6600Intel  $50Bench 42%, 59,658 samples25x
Core2 Duo E8400Intel  $53Bench 40%, 68,540 samples21x
Core2 Quad Q9550Intel  $161Bench 49%, 34,093 samples19x
GPU
Radeon HD 2600-PROATIBench 1%, 190 samples1x
SSD
A400 120GBKingston  $30Bench 61%, 166,392 samples12x
A400 240GBKingston  $25Bench 66%, 424,288 samples5x
860 Evo 250GBSamsung  $52Bench 104%, 296,814 samples4x
RAM
44GBUnknownBench 23%, 6,316 samples82x
40GBUnknownBench 22%, 7,939 samples61x
42GBUnknownBench 23%, 3,060 samples25x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 46% - Average Total price: $80

Popular Radeon HD 2600-PRO systems:

How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

Gaming Desktop ProGaming

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC
  • - See speed test results from other users
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware
Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) November 2024 GPU Rankings

We calculate effective 3D speed which estimates gaming performance for the top 12 games. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield value for money. Our figures are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. [GPUPro]

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.

 Comments

Added n/a ago.
USA-User
Avatar level
10,034

Terrible (edit your comment) Add link

6 years ago.

DEU-User
Avatar level
5,867

Poor

3 years ago.

My first and best GPU for that time!!! My favourote!!!

Your
opinion?
▲Like ▼Dislike
Ready to retire
Age: 10 years

Speed Comparisons

vs Nvidia RTX 4060
vs Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti
vs Nvidia RTX 4070
vs Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti
vs Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super)
vs Nvidia RTX 3070
vs Nvidia RTX 3060
vs Nvidia RTX 4070-Ti
vs Nvidia RTX 3080

713 Graphics Cards (Compared) Thousands of user benchmarks compiled into one comparison list

See how consistently different GPUs perform with varying real world conditions. The charts also illustrate overall performance, popularity and rank.

 Frequently Asked Questions

Computer Components FAQ
What is the UBM value for money rating?
What is UBM Effective Speed?
Thunderbolt speed?
Are USB 3.0 cables different?
Graphics Cards
How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs?
What are the UBM DX11 GPU tests?
What are the UBM DX10 GPU tests?
What are the UBM DX09 GPU tests?
What is the Splatting GPU benchmark?
What is the Gravity (NBody) GPU benchmark?
What is the MRender GPU benchmark?
What is the parallax (POM) GPU benchmark?
What is the reflection (HDR) GPU benchmark?
What is the lighting (LDPRT) benchmark?
What is the GPU value for money rating?
What is the effective GPU speed index?
ALL FAQs »

 Best User Rated
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback