Today's hottest deals

Average Bench: 1.88% (555th of 713)

Based on 551 user benchmarks.  Devices: 10DE 08A0, 10DE 08A4, 10DE 08A3 Model: NVIDIA GeForce 320M
Poor: 2%Average: 1.88% Great: 2%

Terrible average bench

The Nvidia GeForce 320M averaged 98.1% lower than the peak scores attained by the group leaders. This isn't a great result which indicates that there are much faster alternatives on the comparison list.

Strengths

Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat) 2.32fps
Avg. Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm) 2.59fps

Excellent consistency

The range of scores (95th - 5th percentile) for the Nvidia GeForce 320M is just 0.51%. This is an extremely narrow range which indicates that the Nvidia GeForce 320M performs superbly consistently under varying real world conditions.

Weaknesses

Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot) 2.96fps
Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones) 0.95fps

Average Bench

(Based on 551 samples)
Min Avg Max
1.9 Lighting 2.32 2.47
1.7 Reflection 2.96 3.54
0.7 Parallax 0.95 1.11
1.9% 2.08 fps
Min Avg Max
1.73 MRender 2.43 2.93
1.44 Gravity 1.72 1.8
1.9 Splatting 2.59 2.87
1.9% 2.25 fps
User Benchmarks Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
The fastest GPU (mainstream) averages a speed of 100%
Apple(106B 00C2) 256MB
Ram: 256MB, Driver: 341.74
Lighting 2.2
Reflection 0.3
Parallax 0.6
2% 1.03 fps
MRender 2.1
Gravity 1.7
Splatting 1.5
1% 1.77 fps
Apple(106B 00CE) 256MB
Ram: 256MB, Driver: 341.74
Lighting 2.1
Reflection 0.2
Parallax 0.9
2% 1.07 fps
MRender 2
Gravity 1.6
Splatting 1.8
2% 1.8 fps
Apple(106B 00CE) 256MB
Ram: 256MB, Driver: 342.01
Lighting 2
Reflection 0.2
Parallax 0.4
2% 0.87 fps
MRender 2.1
Gravity 1.7
Splatting 1.6
1% 1.8 fps
Apple(106B 00C0) 256MB
Ram: 256MB, Driver: 342.01
Lighting 2
Reflection 2.2
Parallax 1.1
2% 1.77 fps
MRender 1.8
Gravity 1.6
Splatting 1.8
1% 1.73 fps
Apple(106B 00C0) 256MB
Ram: 256MB, Driver: 341.74
Lighting 1.9
Reflection 0.6
Parallax 0.7
2% 1.07 fps
MRender 2.1
Gravity 1.7
Splatting 1.8
2% 1.87 fps
Apple(106B 00C2) 256MB
Ram: 256MB, Driver: 342.01
Lighting 1.9
Reflection 0.3
Parallax 0.4
2% 0.87 fps
MRender 2
Gravity 1.7
Splatting 1.6
1% 1.77 fps
Apple(106B 00D3) 256MB
Ram: 256MB, Driver: 341.74
Lighting 1.9
Reflection 1.9
Parallax 1.3
2% 1.7 fps
MRender 2
Gravity 1.7
Splatting 1.5
1% 1.73 fps
Apple(106B 00CE) 256MB
Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 8.17.12.6141
Lighting 1.8
Reflection 0.4
Parallax 1.1
2% 1.1 fps
MRender 1.6
Gravity 1.7
Splatting 1.6
1% 1.63 fps
Apple(106B 00C2) 256MB
Ram: 256MB, Driver: 342.01
Lighting 1
Reflection 0.3
Parallax 0.8
1% 0.7 fps
MRender 1.7
Gravity 1.7
Splatting 1.6
1% 1.67 fps
551 MORE »

 Market Share (See Leaders)

The number of benchmark samples for this model as a percentage of all 68,447,299 GPUs tested

 Popular Cards (based on 551 benchmarks)

If you buy via one of these links, our site may earn a commission

Hardware Id Samples Bench ± SD Model / Price
Apple(106B 00C2) 52% 2% ± 0%
Apple(106B 00CE) 30% 2% ± 0%
Apple(106B 00C0) 10% 2% ± 0%
Apple(106B 00D3) 8% 2% ± 0%
Send price feedback
Typical GeForce 320M Builds (Compare 22 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 38%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Apple MacBook7,1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 41% - Average Total price: $72

Popular GeForce 320M systems:

How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC
  • - See speed test results from other users
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware
Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) October 2024 GPU Rankings

We calculate effective 3D speed which estimates gaming performance for the top 12 games. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield value for money. Our figures are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. [GPUPro]

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.

 Comments

Added n/a ago.

Terrible

5 years ago.

I have on this card 20fps on games like fortnite on low settings and even setting own even lower settings. that card is really bad.


Terrible

4 years ago.

My mid 2010 MacBook Pro's graphic card. Always played all low csgo with 25fps until something like last year when it started struggling even in homepage. Still runs 60ish fps league.


Average

4 years ago.

I have this graphic card and not supports some things (games).


Good

3 years ago.

Integrated graphics found in NVIDIA chipsets, mostly from Apple. The GeForce 320M, though outdated, can still put up a fair fight against graphics cards like the HD 6450. Overclocking is easy and very good on this iGPU, making tasks like watching YouTube a lot easier. Benchmarks: Elder Scrolls IV Oblivion (1280 x 800 medium 2x) ~ 40 FPS GTA V (540 x 400 normal no shadows) ~ 30 FPS Minecraft 1.17.x (Fancy, 8 chunks, optifine) ~ 50 FPS (Bottlenecked by CPU) Unfortunately, these are usually paid with low-powered Core 2 Duo's.


Your
opinion?
713 Graphics Cards (Compared) Thousands of user benchmarks compiled into one comparison list

See how consistently different GPUs perform with varying real world conditions. The charts also illustrate overall performance, popularity and rank.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $218Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback