Asrock H81M-HDS

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 28% Raft	Desktop 78% Battleship	Workstation 22% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	34.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago.

Motherboard	Asrock H81M-HDS (all builds)
Memory	10.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20140702
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Aug 08 '18 at 01:06
Run Duration	135 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	22%

PC Performing as expected (59^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-4460-$194 245,403 User benchmarks, average bench 62% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	77.2% Very good	Memory 91.6 1-Core 94 2-Core 186 73% 124 Pts	4-Core 365 8-Core 365 49% 365 Pts	64-Core 365 23% 365 Pts
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 77.2% Great: 72%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 960-$198 440,282 User benchmarks, average bench 33% PNY(196E 1138) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1405 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 391.35 Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)	34.5% Below average	Lighting 44.8 Reflection 43.5 Parallax 38.5 36% 42.3 fps	MRender 38.8 Gravity 38.7 Splatting 35.6 31% 37.7 fps
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 34.5% Great: 36%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$29 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 594GB free (System drive) Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 79 64 119 144 122 112 MB/s Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)	76.8% Very good	Read 160 Write 157 Mixed 51 SusWrite 107 86% 119 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 1.1 205% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 76.8% Great: 109%
Toshiba P300 3TB-$107 74,038 User benchmarks, average bench 87% 1.5TB free Firmware: MX6OACF0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 149 159 160 155 161 162 MB/s Performing above expectations (68^th percentile)	95.5% Outstanding	Read 175 Write 182 Mixed 39 SusWrite 158 100% 139 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 0.6 149% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 95.5% Great: 108%
SanDisk 8GB 156 User benchmarks, average bench 8% 7GB free, PID 5576 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 4 4.4 4.4 4.4 4.4 4.4 MB/s Performing below expectations (20^th percentile)	6.04% Terrible	Read 13.2 Write 15 Mixed 13.5 SusWrite 4.3 15% 11.5 MB/s	4K Read 4.4 4K Write 0.7 4K Mixed 2.7 132% 2.6 MB/s
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 6.04% Great: 11%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x8GB 236,291 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	58.8% Above average	MC Read 21.9 MC Write 21.2 MC Mixed 18.1 58% 20.4 GB/s	SC Read 15.4 SC Write 17.5 SC Mixed 18.8 49% 17.2 GB/s	Latency 64.8 62% 64.8 ns
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 58.8% Great: 97%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical H81M-HDS Builds (Compare 1,146 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 9%

Tree trunk

Desktop 66%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 8%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock H81M-HDS - $147

CPU
Core i7-4790Intel $135Bench 71%, 255,027 samples	174x
Core i5-4460Intel $194Bench 62%, 245,403 samples	165x
Core i5-4590Intel $188Bench 63%, 151,366 samples	101x

GPU
HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 230,189 samples	134x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	75x
GTX 1070Nvidia $278Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	57x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	27x
SSDNow V300 120GBKingston $36Bench 54%, 339,020 samples	25x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	25x

RAM
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	89x
2x4GBUnknownBench 39%, 424,126 samples	23x
Ballistix Sport DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBCrucialBench 56%, 44,086 samples	23x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 74% - Very good

Total price: $325

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359