Performance Results


Gaming 30% Sail boat	Desktop 95% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 27% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (84th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 16 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 91.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	25.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	105% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (21%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	MSI MS-7A64
Motherboard	MSI H270 GAMING PRO CARBON (MS-7A64) (all builds)
Memory	13.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20171121
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Aug 15 '18 at 17:20
Run Duration	141 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	21%

PC Performing above expectations (84^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-7700K-$230 712,312 User benchmarks, average bench 84% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.35 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	91.3% Outstanding	Memory 93.7 1-Core 140 2-Core 274 94% 169 Pts	4-Core 479 8-Core 732 75% 606 Pts	64-Core 776 48% 776 Pts
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 91.3% Great: 92%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 950-$100 111,509 User benchmarks, average bench 26% Asus(1043 858D) 2GB CLim: 1392 MHz, MLim: 1652 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 398.82 Performing below potential (70^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	25.7% Poor	Lighting 31.5 Reflection 30.7 Parallax 28.3 26% 30.2 fps	MRender 37.4 Gravity 28.8 Splatting 29.5 26% 31.9 fps
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 25.7% Great: 28%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Innovation IT 120GB 294 User benchmarks, average bench 68% 81GB free (System drive) Firmware: Q1013E1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 408 422 422 427 242 111 MB/s Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	105% Outstanding	Read 453 Write 413 Mixed 378 SusWrite 339 89% 396 MB/s	4K Read 48.3 4K Write 133 4K Mixed 34.1 188% 71.9 MB/s	DQ Read 175 DQ Write 318 DQ Mixed 44.4 91% 179 MB/s
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 105% Great: 105%
Samsung 850 Evo 120GB-$80 69,224 User benchmarks, average bench 96% 73GB free Firmware: EMT01B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 338 150 151 151 151 152 MB/s Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	120% Outstanding	Read 504 Write 486 Mixed 398 SusWrite 182 88% 393 MB/s	4K Read 50.5 4K Write 137 4K Mixed 65.5 233% 84.4 MB/s	DQ Read 383 DQ Write 344 DQ Mixed 354 268% 360 MB/s
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 120% Great: 115%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28 1,562,409 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 931GB free Firmware: CC43 SusWrite @10s intervals: 166 169 189 189 180 169 MB/s Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)	99.1% Outstanding	Read 169 Write 136 Mixed 81.7 SusWrite 177 103% 141 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.8 152% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 99.1% Great: 112%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x8GB 236,291 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)	78.2% Very good	MC Read 30 MC Write 29.9 MC Mixed 22.2 78% 27.4 GB/s	SC Read 18.4 SC Write 29.8 SC Mixed 24.8 70% 24.3 GB/s	Latency 60.5 66% 60.5 ns
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 78.2% Great: 97%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 52%

Yacht

Desktop 89%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 45%

Speed boat

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	25x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	11x
980 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $94Bench 251%, 262,559 samples	9x

RAM
HyperX 2400 C15 2x8GBKingstonBench 76%, 122,822 samples	16x
Ripjaws V DDR4 2400 C15 2x8GBG.SKILL $31Bench 71%, 98,777 samples	12x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2400 C16 2x8GBCorsair $42Bench 76%, 105,447 samples	11x

Value: 78% - Very good

Total price: $446

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16