Gigabyte GA-H110M-WW-CF

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	56.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (25%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago.

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-H110M-WW-CF (all builds)
Memory	5.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20160628
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Aug 21 '18 at 19:39
Run Duration	127 Seconds
Run User	MYS-User
Background CPU	25%

Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (50^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3-6100-$40 110,166 User benchmarks, average bench 55% U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	69.5% Good	Memory 87.3 1-Core 110 2-Core 183 75% 127 Pts	4-Core 301 8-Core 300 40% 300 Pts	64-Core 300 19% 300 Pts
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 69.5% Great: 68%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117 1,368,019 User benchmarks, average bench 56% EVGA(3842 6161) CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 398.82 Performing below potential (73^rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide	56.7% Above average	Lighting 71 Reflection 70.2 Parallax 59.5 58% 66.9 fps	MRender 68.5 Gravity 64.5 Splatting 66.4 54% 66.5 fps
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 56.7% Great: 60%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Apacer AS330 120GB 735 User benchmarks, average bench 76% 15GB free (System drive) Firmware: AP223PD0 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 394 Write 436 Mixed 302 84% 377 MB/s	4K Read 23.5 4K Write 57 4K Mixed 31.4 106% 37.3 MB/s	DQ Read 260 DQ Write 340 DQ Mixed 170 164% 257 MB/s
Poor: 45% Great: 96%
BUFFALO HD-PNFU3 1TB 200 User benchmarks, average bench 28% 664GB free, PID 0251 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 6 6.4 5.5 4 5.3 3.9 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	11.3% Very poor	Read 41.8 Write 4 Mixed 10.5 SusWrite 5.2 15% 15.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.3 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.3 56% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 11.3% Great: 43%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 9905678-041.A00G 0420 F4-2400C15-4GIS 8GB 5 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 2133, 2133 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing below potential (20^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	66.3% Good	MC Read 24.6 MC Write 25.4 MC Mixed 20.5 67% 23.5 GB/s	SC Read 15.1 SC Write 21.9 SC Mixed 20.3 55% 19.1 GB/s	Latency 70.2 57% 70.2 ns
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 66.3% Great: 69%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-H110M-WW-CF Builds (Compare 61 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 60%

Gunboat

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H110M-WW-CF

CPU
Pentium G4560Intel $31Bench 57%, 70,054 samples	10x
Core i5-7400Intel $95Bench 64%, 234,266 samples	8x
Core i3-7100Intel $41Bench 57%, 79,299 samples	8x

GPU
HD 630 (Desktop Kaby Lake)IntelBench 5%, 153,031 samples	9x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	8x
GeForce GT 730NvidiaBench 5%, 164,888 samples	5x

SSD
870 EVO 500GBSamsung $62Bench 104%, 60,851 samples	3x
BarraCuda Q1 SSD ZA240CV10001 240GBSeagateBench 69%, 1,293 samples	3x
850 Evo 120GBSamsung $80Bench 96%, 69,224 samples	2x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2400 C16 1x8GBCorsair $25Bench 42%, 47,473 samples	4x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 1x8GBCorsairBench 45%, 4,221 samples	3x
HyperX DDR4 2400 C15 2x4GBKingstonBench 76%, 38,955 samples	2x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 59% - Above average

Total price: $118

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16