Asus P8B75-M

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (19th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 81 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 36.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics25.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive26.2% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (65%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
MotherboardAsus P8B75-M  (all builds)
Memory11.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130613
Uptime2.7 Days
Run DateSep 08 '18 at 19:03
Run Duration243 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 65%
Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2400-$250
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 0.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
36.8% Below average
Memory 70.7
1-Core 12.3
2-Core 24.7
29% 35.9 Pts
4-Core 20.6
8-Core 22.1
3% 21.4 Pts
64-Core 23.1
1% 23.1 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 36.8%
Great: 70%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130
CLim: 1366 MHz, MLim: 1500 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 18.7.1
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
25.2% Poor
Lighting 16.6
Reflection 18.3
Parallax 50
14% 28.3 fps
MRender 61.7
Gravity 67.3
Splatting 49.5
48% 59.5 fps
Poor: 46%
This bench: 25.2%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Q-360 360GB
217GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 154 161 65 1.7 12 62 MB/s
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
26.2% Poor
Read 190
Write 90
Mixed 72.3
SusWrite 75.9
24% 107 MB/s
4K Read 9.1
4K Write 11.9
4K Mixed 11.9
35% 11 MB/s
DQ Read 75.4
DQ Write 48.7
DQ Mixed 75.7
53% 66.6 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 26.2%
Great: 92%
Toshiba X300 6TB-$78
5TB free
Firmware: FS2A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 108 109 124 122 152 118 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
74.5% Very good
Read 135
Write 121
Mixed 69.7
SusWrite 122
82% 112 MB/s
4K Read 7.1
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1
451% 3.5 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 74.5%
Great: 109%
Hitachi HDT721064SLA360 640GB-$135
595GB free
Firmware: STDOA39D
SusWrite @10s intervals: 86 89 97 89 105 92 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
51.6% Above average
Read 86.5
Write 102
Mixed 49.5
SusWrite 93
61% 82.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.9
164% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 51.6%
Great: 59%
PNY USB 3.0 FD 133GB
63GB free, PID 00ad
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1.9 9 4.1 15 18 14 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
7.19% Terrible
Read 18.8
Write 2.7
Mixed 18.5
SusWrite 10.2
16% 12.6 MB/s
4K Read 1.7
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.9
57% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 7.19%
Great: 37%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown F6451U64G1600G 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
17.5% Very poor
MC Read 4
MC Write 8.5
MC Mixed 4.2
16% 5.57 GB/s
SC Read 4.3
SC Write 4
SC Mixed 4
12% 4.1 GB/s
Latency 99.8
40% 99.8 ns
Poor: 17%
This bench: 17.5%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8B75-M Builds (Compare 1,498 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus P8B75-M - $470

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 67% - Good Total price: $906
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback