Lenovo 5049WK1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics4.28% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive55.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
SystemLenovo 5049WK1  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO
Memory13.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110711
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateSep 10 '18 at 19:05
Run Duration140 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2600-$186
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
74.6% Very good
Memory 89.6
1-Core 98.6
2-Core 192
74% 127 Pts
4-Core 323
8-Core 464
49% 394 Pts
64-Core 469
29% 469 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 74.6%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 710
Asus(1043 85E7) 2GB
CLim: 954 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 398.82
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
4.28% Terrible
Lighting 5.07
Reflection 4.54
Parallax 4.91
4% 4.84 fps
MRender 6.48
Gravity 3.9
Splatting 6.17
4% 5.52 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.28%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Drevo X1 SSD 256GB
195GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P1205A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 231 229 229 231 231 231 MB/s
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
55.5% Above average
Read 243
Write 230
Mixed 224
SusWrite 230
52% 232 MB/s
4K Read 18.2
4K Write 28.7
4K Mixed 23.1
72% 23.3 MB/s
DQ Read 207
DQ Write 197
DQ Mixed 173
138% 192 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 55.5%
Great: 110%
Toshiba P300 1TB-$32
886GB free
Firmware: MS2OA8J0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 183 185 173 184 186 189 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
103% Outstanding
Read 174
Write 165
Mixed 41.4
SusWrite 183
102% 141 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.6
145% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 103%
Great: 107%
WD Elements 25A2 500GB
389GB free, PID 25a2
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 57 58 58 57 57 58 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
22.5% Poor
Read 59.2
Write 60.1
Mixed 23.3
SusWrite 57.5
66% 50 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.4
29% 0.43 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 22.5%
Great: 57%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CT102464BA160B.C16 Samsung M378B1G73EB0-CK0 16GB
1333, 1333 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
28.3% Poor
MC Read 9
MC Write 8.6
MC Mixed 8.3
25% 8.63 GB/s
SC Read 8.8
SC Write 10
SC Mixed 9
26% 9.27 GB/s
Latency 67.8
59% 67.8 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 28.3%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 5049WK1 Builds (Compare 3 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 20%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard

System: Lenovo 5049WK1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 73% - Very good Total price: $309
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback