Asrock Z87 Killer

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 54%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 46%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (80th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 20 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 92.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics56.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive105% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (42%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsrock Z87 Killer  (all builds)
Memory21.3 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150514
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateOct 15 '18 at 21:22
Run Duration192 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 42%

 PC Performing above expectations (80th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4770K-$120
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 4.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
92.2% Outstanding
Memory 91.3
1-Core 131
2-Core 251
88% 158 Pts
4-Core 506
8-Core 696
76% 601 Pts
64-Core 710
44% 710 Pts
Poor: 60%
This bench: 92.2%
Great: 84%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
Zotac(19DA 2370) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1657 MHz, MLim: 1800 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 416.34
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
56.2% Above average
Lighting 69
Reflection 79
Parallax 67.8
56% 71.9 fps
MRender 76.8
Gravity 67.5
Splatting 63.5
56% 69.3 fps
Poor: 43%
This bench: 56.2%
Great: 54%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Mushkin Reactor 1TB-$50
893GB free (System drive)
Firmware: N1007C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 390 397 402 405 400 400 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
105% Outstanding
Read 509
Write 437
Mixed 306
SusWrite 399
93% 413 MB/s
4K Read 28.9
4K Write 102
4K Mixed 42.4
152% 57.8 MB/s
DQ Read 279
DQ Write 297
DQ Mixed 198
174% 258 MB/s
Poor: 67%
This bench: 105%
Great: 105%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$60
240GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 94 96 94 92 95 97 MB/s
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
56.7% Above average
Read 102
Write 100
Mixed 60.8
SusWrite 94.6
66% 89.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.7
158% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 56.7%
Great: 67%
WD Green 1TB (2009)-$72
67GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 72 72 70 68 73 73 MB/s
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
46.4% Average
Read 89.8
Write 88.5
Mixed 60.3
SusWrite 71.5
57% 77.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.7
142% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 46.4%
Great: 57%
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2017)-$63
3.5TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 170 175 166 160 176 178 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 40% Great: 90%
Hitachi HDS721010CLA632 1TB-$105
123GB free
Firmware: JP4OA41A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 79 80 79 69 80 81 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
55% Above average
Read 114
Write 112
Mixed 63.8
SusWrite 78.1
68% 91.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.8
150% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 55%
Great: 76%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$60
188GB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 115 117 115 115 116 118 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
59.8% Above average
Read 92.5
Write 90
Mixed 79.3
SusWrite 116
70% 94.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.7
147% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 59.8%
Great: 67%
Patriot Memory 64GB
25GB free, PID 5500
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 166 174 175 176 176 171 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
69.1% Good
Read 197
Write 165
Mixed 59.8
SusWrite 173
193% 149 MB/s
4K Read 10.7
4K Write 0.1
4K Mixed 0.1
46% 3.63 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 69.1%
Great: 57%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905403-406.A00LF 9905403-406.A00LF 0420 F3-12800CL10-8GBXL 0420 F3-12800CL10-8GBXL 24GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
52.2% Above average
MC Read 18.3
MC Write 18.3
MC Mixed 15.5
50% 17.4 GB/s
SC Read 15.4
SC Write 19.9
SC Mixed 18.2
51% 17.8 GB/s
Latency 65.2
61% 65.2 ns
Poor: 34%
This bench: 52.2%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z87 Killer Builds (Compare 425 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 33%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Asrock Z87 Killer - $216

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 82% - Excellent Total price: $513
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $229Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $109Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $397
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback