Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 1% Tree trunk	Desktop 62% Destroyer	Workstation 1% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	2.66% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

PC Performing above expectations (72^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-2400-$250 166,255 User benchmarks, average bench 61% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.1 GHz Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	75.3% Very good	Memory 92.3 1-Core 89.4 2-Core 158 69% 113 Pts	4-Core 339 8-Core 338 45% 338 Pts	64-Core 338 21% 338 Pts
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 75.3% Great: 70%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD R7 250 25,802 User benchmarks, average bench 8% Dell(1028 2120) 2GB CLim: 1050 MHz, MLim: 1000 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 18.10.1 Relative performance (0^th percentile)	2.66% Terrible	Lighting 0 Reflection 11.8 Parallax 13.5 0% 8.44 fps	MRender 8.76 Gravity 8.93 Splatting 10.6 8% 9.42 fps
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 2.66% Great: 9%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WD Blue 250GB (2010)-$43 50,270 User benchmarks, average bench 50% 77GB free (System drive) Firmware: 19.01H19 SusWrite @10s intervals: 27 37 44 41 41 44 MB/s Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	35.3% Below average	Read 83.6 Write 66.5 Mixed 53.5 SusWrite 39 45% 60.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.9 159% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 35.3% Great: 70%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Nanya NT4GC64B8HG0NF-CG 1x4GB 1,095 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 1 of 4 slots used 4GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	30.7% Below average	MC Read 9.8 MC Write 9.7 MC Mixed 9 27% 9.5 GB/s	SC Read 9.1 SC Write 9.9 SC Mixed 9.9 28% 9.63 GB/s	Latency 63.5 63% 63.5 ns
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 30.7% Great: 30%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 57%

Gunboat

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples	1,229x
GT 1030NvidiaBench 14%, 185,384 samples	449x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	394x

RAM
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	79x
HMT351U6CFR8C-H9 2x4GBHynixBench 48%, 7,511 samples	59x
M378B5273DH0-CH9 2x4GBSamsungBench 48%, 11,003 samples	50x

Value: 58% - Above average

Total price: $278

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16