Today's hottest deals

Asrock 990FX Extreme4

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics36.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 3 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
MotherboardAsrock 990FX Extreme4  (all builds)
Memory11.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20121015
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 02 '18 at 23:39
Run Duration151 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8350-$85
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
69.8% Good
Memory 91.6
1-Core 71.7
2-Core 120
60% 94.5 Pts
4-Core 261
8-Core 413
42% 337 Pts
64-Core 420
26% 420 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 69.8%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 280X-$500
CLim: 1070 MHz, MLim: 1550 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 18.12.1
Performing below potential (74th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
36.1% Below average
Lighting 52.3
Reflection 18.6
Parallax 65.8
43% 45.6 fps
MRender 33
Gravity 25.4
Splatting 27.4
23% 28.6 fps
Poor: 31%
This bench: 36.1%
Great: 39%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Pro 128GB-$58
7GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXM01B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 486
Write 252
Mixed 236
71% 325 MB/s
4K Read 31.1
4K Write 61.4
4K Mixed 36.2
126% 42.9 MB/s
DQ Read 213
DQ Write 187
DQ Mixed 185
143% 195 MB/s
Poor: 71% Great: 119%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$51
1.5TB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.3 0.2 0.4 0.2 0.1 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
37.8% Below average
Read 132
Write 0.3
Mixed 1.6
SusWrite 0.2
24% 33.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.4
85% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 37.8%
Great: 114%
Seagate Expansion Desk 2TB
1.5TB free, PID 3320
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 42 59 57 35 49 49 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
44.9% Average
Read 77.2
Write 84.4
Mixed 46.5
SusWrite 48.4
85% 64.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 7.5
4K Mixed 0.6
277% 2.83 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 44.9%
Great: 74%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905474-062.A00LF Corsair CMZ8GX3M2A1600C9 9905474-062.A00LF Corsair CMZ8GX3M2A1600C9 16GB
667, 667, 667, 667 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
47.2% Average
MC Read 19.3
MC Write 14.7
MC Mixed 16
48% 16.7 GB/s
SC Read 10.9
SC Write 8.3
SC Mixed 12.5
30% 10.6 GB/s
Latency 64.8
62% 64.8 ns
Poor: 47%
This bench: 47.2%
Great: 50%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 990FX Extreme4 Builds (Compare 72 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 63%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 50%
Yacht

Motherboard: Asrock 990FX Extreme4 - $229

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 102% - Outstanding Total price: $556
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $85
Intel Core i5-13600K $200Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback