Asus H87M-PRO

Performance Results


Gaming 10% Tree trunk	Desktop 65% Battle cruiser	Workstation 9% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (26th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 74 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	8.47% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	93.6% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (55%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asus H87M-PRO (all builds)
Memory	7.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20130510
Uptime	3.3 Days
Run Date	Dec 12 '18 at 20:20
Run Duration	159 Seconds
Run User	ESP-User
Background CPU	55%

PC Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-4770-$75 176,321 User benchmarks, average bench 70% SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)	64.8% Good	Memory 80 1-Core 89.9 2-Core 164 66% 111 Pts	4-Core 270 8-Core 378 41% 324 Pts	64-Core 413 26% 413 Pts
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 64.8% Great: 78%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 650-$112 69,673 User benchmarks, average bench 8% Asus(1043 843E) 2GB CLim: 1071 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 417.22 Performing as expected (45^th percentile)	8.47% Terrible	Lighting 9.33 Reflection 8.81 Parallax 10.9 8% 9.67 fps	MRender 13 Gravity 11.5 Splatting 12.6 10% 12.4 fps
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 8.47% Great: 9%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 164GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 381 245 173 172 177 172 MB/s Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)	93.6% Outstanding	Read 416 Write 376 Mixed 323 SusWrite 220 75% 334 MB/s	4K Read 32.2 4K Write 79.2 4K Mixed 47.4 152% 52.9 MB/s	DQ Read 377 DQ Write 343 DQ Mixed 358 269% 359 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 93.6% Great: 134%
Maxtor STM332061 320GB 35 User benchmarks, average bench 50% 49GB free Firmware: MX13 SusWrite @10s intervals: 64 58 52 61 65 62 MB/s Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	40.3% Average	Read 80 Write 80.7 Mixed 43 SusWrite 60.2 48% 66 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.8 148% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 40.3% Great: 60%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28 1,562,409 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 72GB free Firmware: CC47 SusWrite @10s intervals: 39 42 44 50 46 23 MB/s Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	15.6% Very poor	Read 13.7 Write 40.8 Mixed 10.5 SusWrite 40.7 19% 26.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.1 4K Write 0.8 4K Mixed 0.3 52% 0.4 MB/s
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 15.6% Great: 112%
Philips USB Flash Drive 64GB 67 User benchmarks, average bench 6% 15GB free, PID 4200 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.9 7.3 15 14 15 15 MB/s Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)	9.08% Terrible	Read 23.2 Write 12 Mixed 10 SusWrite 11.8 17% 14.2 MB/s	4K Read 5.5 4K Write 0.6 4K Mixed 0.9 71% 2.33 MB/s
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 9.08% Great: 10%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HyperX DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GB 28,461 User benchmarks, average bench 56% 4 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	41% Average	MC Read 14.4 MC Write 14.7 MC Mixed 13.1 40% 14.1 GB/s	SC Read 10.5 SC Write 13.6 SC Mixed 11.3 34% 11.8 GB/s	Latency 80.5 50% 80.5 ns
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 41% Great: 76%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical H87M-PRO Builds (Compare 394 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 65%

Destroyer

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus H87M-PRO - $121

CPU
Core i7-4770Intel $75Bench 70%, 176,321 samples	75x
Core i5-4570Intel $99Bench 62%, 129,272 samples	49x
Core i5-4670Intel $51Bench 66%, 49,019 samples	48x

GPU
HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 230,189 samples	35x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	26x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	25x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	18x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	12x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	11x

RAM
Savage DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBHyperXBench 51%, 78,181 samples	19x
HyperX DDR3 2133 C11 2x8GBKingstonBench 61%, 11,630 samples	9x
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 59%, 122,541 samples	8x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 76% - Very good

Total price: $239

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $79	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16