Performance Results


Gaming 3% Tree trunk	Desktop 54% Yacht	Workstation 3% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (80th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 20 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 49.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	7.28% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	23.2% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

PC Performing above expectations (80^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD A4-6300 APU-$51 10,924 User benchmarks, average bench 40% P0, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 2 threads Base clock 3.7 GHz Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	49.7% Average	Memory 82.3 1-Core 64.2 2-Core 102 54% 82.8 Pts	4-Core 102 8-Core 105 14% 103 Pts	64-Core 104 6% 104 Pts
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 49.7% Great: 51%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD R7 240 58,337 User benchmarks, average bench 5% PwrHis(1787 2335) 1GB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 14.501.1003.0 Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	7.28% Terrible	Lighting 8.07 Reflection 10.8 Parallax 9.94 7% 9.6 fps	MRender 11.6 Gravity 7.2 Splatting 12.3 9% 10.4 fps
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 7.28% Great: 6%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Virtual Disk 80GB 23 User benchmarks, average bench 17% 27GB free (System drive) Firmware: 0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 45 46 45 47 47 49 MB/s Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	23.2% Poor	Read 62.8 Write 86.3 Mixed 71.3 SusWrite 46.5 15% 66.7 MB/s	4K Read 9.3 4K Write 21.9 4K Mixed 21 53% 17.4 MB/s	DQ Read 19.9 DQ Write 8.1 DQ Mixed 15.3 11% 14.4 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 23.2% Great: 23%
Virtual Disk 480GB 10 User benchmarks, average bench 15% 263GB free Firmware: 0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 50 48 47 47 47 49 MB/s Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	21.8% Poor	Read 64.3 Write 76.3 Mixed 73.5 SusWrite 47.9 15% 65.5 MB/s	4K Read 8.4 4K Write 19.9 4K Mixed 18.9 48% 15.7 MB/s	DQ Read 22.2 DQ Write 11.4 DQ Mixed 13.7 11% 15.8 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 21.8% Great: 18%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M378B5773QB0-CK0 2x2GB 226 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 2 of 2 slots used 4GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing below potential (10^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	30.1% Below average	MC Read 13 MC Write 6.3 MC Mixed 9.9 28% 9.73 GB/s	SC Read 8.7 SC Write 7.8 SC Mixed 10.3 26% 8.93 GB/s	Latency 76.3 52% 76.3 ns
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 30.1% Great: 59%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 11%

Tree trunk

Desktop 55%

Yacht

Workstation 9%

Tree trunk

RAM
99U5471-033.A00LF 8GBUnknownBench 34%, 26 samples	2x
2x4GBUnknownBench 39%, 424,126 samples	1x
CML8GX3M2A1600C9 8GBCorsairBench 40%, 210 samples	1x

Value: 47% - Average

Total price: $171