Today's hottest deals

Asus Crosshair V Formula

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing CPU, RAM
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Graphics21.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive60% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
High background CPU (27%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus Crosshair V Formula  (all builds)
Memory12.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20120627
Uptime2.7 Days
Run DateJan 24 '15 at 00:03
Run Duration241 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 27%

 PC Performing below expectations (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Phenom II X6 1090T-$240
AM3r2, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.25 GHz (avg)
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
1-Core 62.5
2-Core 126
43% 94 Pts
4-Core 230
8-Core 301
34% 266 Pts
64-Core 334
21% 334 Pts
Poor: 48% Great: 64%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD HD 6950-$290
XFX(1682 3122) 2GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 13.251.9001.1001
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
21.3% Poor
Lighting 27.2
Reflection 22
Parallax 23.7
22% 24.3 fps
MRender 20.5
Gravity 21.7
Splatting 27.5
20% 23.2 fps
Poor: 18%
This bench: 21.3%
Great: 21%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$99
81GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0CB6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
60% Good
Read 467
Write 280
Mixed 302
77% 349 MB/s
4K Read 25.6
4K Write 28.4
4K Mixed 12.5
70% 22.2 MB/s
DQ Read 24.9
DQ Write 149
DQ Mixed 11.9
31% 61.8 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 60%
Great: 118%
SiImage 110GB
74GB free
Firmware: 0000
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
33.4% Below average
Read 290
Write 42.6
Mixed 55.3
28% 129 MB/s
4K Read 12.3
4K Write 41.2
4K Mixed 9.99
53% 21.2 MB/s
DQ Read 119
DQ Write 39.5
DQ Mixed 23.8
32% 60.7 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 33.4%
Great: 52%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 3TB-$45
2TB free
Firmware: CC4C Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
91.2% Outstanding
Read 169
Write 150
Mixed 143
116% 154 MB/s
4K Read 0.91
4K Write 1.39
4K Mixed 0.35
103% 0.89 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 91.2%
Great: 113%
Hitachi HDS72302 2TB
685GB free, PID 1013
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
36.6% Below average
Read 84.1
Write 91.6
Mixed 73.8
107% 83.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.41
4K Mixed 0.3
60% 0.74 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 36.6%
Great: 58%
Typical Crosshair V Formula Builds (Compare 280 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 32%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 26%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus Crosshair V Formula - $220

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 55% - Above average Total price: $645
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $215Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback