| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (14th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 86 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good. |
| Graphics | 101% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels. |
| Boot Drive | 12.8% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD. |
| Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| Motherboard | Asus TUF Z370-PLUS GAMING (all builds) |
| Memory | 10.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20180702 |
| Uptime | 0.1 Days |
| Run Date | Feb 16 '19 at 19:14 |
| Run Duration | 364 Seconds |
| Run User | ISR-User |
| Background CPU | 11% |
PC Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i9-9900K-$410
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
|
81.5%
Excellent
|
82% 143 Pts
|
65% 541 Pts
|
68% 1,106 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia RTX 2070-$200
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 418.81
Performing below potential (33rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
101%
Outstanding
|
102% 123 fps
|
100% 126 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Vaseky V800/500G 500GB
219GB free (System drive)
Firmware: R0817A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 48 26 27 25 28 24 MB/s
|
12.8%
Very poor
|
6% 25.3 MB/s
|
36% 9.1 MB/s
| |
|
Samsung HD502HI 500GB-$154
293GB free
Firmware: 1AG01118
SusWrite @10s intervals: 98 95 94 98 96 97 MB/s
|
28.4%
Poor
|
22% 30.9 MB/s
|
28% 0.3 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Kingston 9905622-058.A00G 08CD M378A1K43BB2-CRC 16GB
2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
|
59.7%
Above average
|
61% 21.4 GB/s
|
41% 14.2 GB/s
|
62% 64.3 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical TUF Z370-PLUS GAMING Builds (Compare 4,313 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asus TUF Z370-PLUS GAMING - $135
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i7-8700KIntel $186Bench 88%, 746,287 samples | 1,514x |
| Core i5-8600KIntel $173Bench 91%, 264,837 samples | 833x |
| Core i7-8700Intel $200Bench 87%, 349,567 samples | 573x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples | 401x |
| GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples | 346x |
| GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 339x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 73% - Very good | Total price: $844 |