Gigabyte X470 AORUS GAMING 5 WIFI

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 68%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 63%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (89th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 11 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 90.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics66.9% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive246% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
SystemGigabyte X470 AORUS GAMING 5 WIFI
MotherboardGigabyte X470 AORUS GAMING 5 WIFI  (all builds)
Memory13.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190125
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 13 '19 at 04:15
Run Duration217 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 17%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 2600-$140
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 4.05 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
90.9% Outstanding
Memory 89.1
1-Core 124
2-Core 250
86% 154 Pts
4-Core 498
8-Core 812
80% 655 Pts
64-Core 1,016
63% 1,016 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 90.9%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
CLim: 2113 MHz, MLim: 2176 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 419.35
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
66.9% Good
Lighting 84.1
Reflection 83.5
Parallax 72.1
68% 79.9 fps
MRender 79.7
Gravity 78.1
Splatting 76.3
64% 78 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 66.9%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX500 1TB-$84
334GB free
Firmware: M3CR023
SusWrite @10s intervals: 304 390 389 392 393 352 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
117% Outstanding
Read 513
Write 469
Mixed 427
SusWrite 370
100% 445 MB/s
4K Read 37.8
4K Write 112
4K Mixed 54.1
186% 67.8 MB/s
DQ Read 385
DQ Write 360
DQ Mixed 302
246% 349 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 117%
Great: 125%
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$104
190GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1087 310 311 311 311 311 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
246% Outstanding
Read 2,362
Write 1,455
Mixed 1,209
SusWrite 440
302% 1,367 MB/s
4K Read 60.9
4K Write 130
4K Mixed 77.7
261% 89.6 MB/s
DQ Read 973
DQ Write 987
DQ Mixed 1,010
751% 990 MB/s
Poor: 160%
This bench: 246%
Great: 280%
Marvell Raid VD 4TB
3.5TB free
Firmware: MV.R00-0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 466 641 646 648 640 646 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
342% Outstanding
Read 576
Write 423
Mixed 129
SusWrite 614
315% 436 MB/s
4K Read 8.2
4K Write 7.9
4K Mixed 2.3
744% 6.13 MB/s
Poor: 104%
This bench: 342%
Great: 342%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$37
2TB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 256 310 301 321 321 301 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 60% Great: 113%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Aegis DDR4 3000 C16 2x8GB-$36
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3133 MHz
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
107% Outstanding
MC Read 43.1
MC Write 38
MC Mixed 34.9
110% 38.7 GB/s
SC Read 25.9
SC Write 39.8
SC Mixed 28.8
90% 31.5 GB/s
Latency 68.4
58% 68.4 ns
Poor: 62%
This bench: 107%
Great: 103%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-X470 AORUS GAMING 5 WIFI-CF Builds (Compare 867 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 83%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 81%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Gigabyte X470 AORUS GAMING 5 WIFI - $475

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 101% - Outstanding Total price: $997
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback