Gigabyte GA-H61M-S2PV

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 27% Raft	Desktop 80% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 21% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	32.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago.

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-H61M-S2PV (all builds)
Memory	6.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20130225
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Mar 13 '19 at 06:45
Run Duration	121 Seconds
Run User	RUS-User
Background CPU	12%

Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (64^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-3570K-$136 185,516 User benchmarks, average bench 68% Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-3570K CPU @ 3.40GHz, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.8 GHz Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	80.2% Excellent	Memory 94 1-Core 100 2-Core 199 77% 131 Pts	4-Core 381 8-Core 399 52% 390 Pts	64-Core 396 24% 396 Pts
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 80.2% Great: 79%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% Asus(1043 85C1) CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 419.35 Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	32.4% Below average	Lighting 40.2 Reflection 32 Parallax 38.2 33% 36.8 fps	MRender 39.2 Gravity 39 Splatting 37.5 32% 38.6 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 32.4% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Seagate ST3250410AS 250GB-$95 20,246 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 59GB free (System drive) Firmware: 3.AAC SusWrite @10s intervals: 60 64 73 85 84 93 MB/s Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)	38.8% Below average	Read 58.5 Write 84.3 Mixed 47.7 SusWrite 76.5 49% 66.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.9 153% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 38.8% Great: 54%
SanDisk Ultra USB 3.0 64GB-$9 17,023 User benchmarks, average bench 27% 10GB free, PID 5581 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.1 7.8 7.6 8.1 8.1 8 MB/s Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	7.16% Terrible	Read 29 Write 23.5 Mixed 7.2 SusWrite 7.8 20% 16.9 MB/s	4K Read 5.3 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0.2 26% 1.83 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 7.16% Great: 39%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
PLEXHDer 2x4GB 29 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 2 of 2 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	61% Good	MC Read 22.2 MC Write 22.3 MC Mixed 18.9 60% 21.1 GB/s	SC Read 16.9 SC Write 17.5 SC Mixed 18.4 50% 17.6 GB/s	Latency 59.7 67% 59.7 ns
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 61% Great: 61%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-H61M-S2PV Builds (Compare 1,530 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 60%

Gunboat

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H61M-S2PV - $99

CPU
Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples	208x
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	175x
Core i3-2120Intel $170Bench 51%, 77,810 samples	108x

GPU
HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples	162x
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples	133x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	87x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	56x
A400 120GBKingston $29Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	33x
860 Evo 250GBSamsung $52Bench 104%, 296,814 samples	24x

RAM
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	27x
99U5471-020.A00LF 1x4GBKingstonBench 26%, 3,387 samples	19x
99U5471-012.A00LF 2x4GBKingstonBench 48%, 7,477 samples	19x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 73% - Very good

Total price: $186

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $79	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16