Performance Results


Gaming 55% Gunboat	Desktop 103% UFO	Workstation 53% Yacht


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (73rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 27 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 102%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics	49.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	265% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	Gigabyte Z390 AORUS ELITE
Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-Z390 AORUS ELITE-CF (all builds)
Memory	10.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kleuren
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180830
Uptime	0.3 Days
Run Date	Mar 13 '19 at 20:51
Run Duration	153 Seconds
Run User	NLD-User
Background CPU	7%

PC Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-9700K-$252 550,833 User benchmarks, average bench 97% U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.55 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	102% Outstanding	Memory 92.8 1-Core 149 2-Core 298 98% 180 Pts	4-Core 595 8-Core 1,128 103% 862 Pts	64-Core 1134 70% 1134 Pts
Poor: 82% ↑ This bench: 102% Great: 105%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200 834,238 User benchmarks, average bench 49% Asus(1043 8508) CLim: 1455 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 419.35 Performing below potential (57^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	49.2% Average	Lighting 59.8 Reflection 66 Parallax 58.4 49% 61.4 fps	MRender 71.6 Gravity 58.5 Splatting 55.9 50% 62 fps
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 49.2% Great: 54%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$92 154,949 User benchmarks, average bench 235% 181GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 571 326 322 324 326 326 MB/s Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)	265% Outstanding	Read 2473 Write 1,471 Mixed 995 SusWrite 366 292% 1,326 MB/s	4K Read 64.3 4K Write 157 4K Mixed 83.2 287% 102 MB/s	DQ Read 980 DQ Write 1,502 DQ Mixed 1,013 831% 1,165 MB/s
Poor: 160% ↑ This bench: 265% Great: 280%
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80 762,998 User benchmarks, average bench 105% 266GB free Firmware: RVT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 369 481 481 485 455 283 MB/s Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)	124% Outstanding	Read 510 Write 483 Mixed 459 SusWrite 426 106% 469 MB/s	4K Read 42.8 4K Write 114 4K Mixed 58.3 200% 71.6 MB/s	DQ Read 380 DQ Write 338 DQ Mixed 354 267% 358 MB/s
Poor: 74% ↑ This bench: 124% Great: 129%
Samsung Spinpoint F4 2TB-$119 45,158 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 1.5TB free Firmware: 1AQ10001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 129 130 130 130 132 133 MB/s Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	73.9% Very good	Read 127 Write 31.5 Mixed 50.8 SusWrite 131 62% 84.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 2.6 4K Mixed 0.8 162% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 73.9% Great: 72%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB-$56 346,786 User benchmarks, average bench 85% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing below potential (20^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	68.5% Good	MC Read 26.6 MC Write 24.7 MC Mixed 20.4 68% 23.9 GB/s	SC Read 16.3 SC Write 24.2 SC Mixed 21.5 59% 20.7 GB/s	Latency 62.5 64% 62.5 ns
Poor: 62% ↑ This bench: 68.5% Great: 110%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 144%

UFO

Desktop 101%

UFO

Workstation 132%

UFO

GPU
RTX 3070Nvidia $400Bench 148%, 619,642 samples	511x
RTX 2070S (Super)Nvidia $210Bench 115%, 663,603 samples	483x
RTX 3080Nvidia $625Bench 187%, 424,051 samples	453x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $90Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	375x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	307x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 273%, 381,216 samples	226x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $45Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	207x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $56Bench 85%, 346,786 samples	192x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	158x

Value: 99% - Outstanding

Total price: $787

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16