| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing above expectations (73rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 27 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 52%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
| Graphics | 27.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 75% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
| System | Csl-computer A0000001 (all builds) |
| Motherboard | ASUSTeK PRIME A320M-K |
| Memory | 5.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20180820 |
| Uptime | 0.1 Days |
| Run Date | Mar 28 '19 at 17:35 |
| Run Duration | 129 Seconds |
| Run User | DEU-User |
| Background CPU | 9% |
PC Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
AMD A10-9700 APU (2016 M.BR)
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg)
|
52%
Above average
|
54% 89.4 Pts
|
28% 214 Pts
|
14% 231 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
27.2%
Poor
|
27% 36.8 fps
|
27% 33 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Toshiba Q300 240GB-$85
71GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SAFM12.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 304 112 86 70 100 166 MB/s
|
75%
Very good
|
75% 336 MB/s
|
107% 38.2 MB/s
|
187% 292 MB/s
|
|
Toshiba MK6475GSX 640GB-$66
63GB free
Firmware: GT001M
SusWrite @10s intervals: 59 57 60 60 60 60 MB/s
|
33.3%
Below average
|
35% 48 MB/s
|
100% 0.8 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Patriot 2400 C16 Series 2666 C16 Series 8GB
2400, 2400 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
|
35.2%
Below average
|
36% 12.6 GB/s
|
23% 8.13 GB/s
|
39% 103 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical A0000001 Builds (Compare 1,721 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
System: Csl-computer A0000001
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i9-9900KIntel $403Bench 98%, 354,223 samples | 237x |
| Core i7-9700KIntel $275Bench 97%, 550,833 samples | 159x |
| Ryzen 7 2700XAMD $210Bench 76%, 159,077 samples | 153x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| RTX 2070Nvidia $200Bench 104%, 478,117 samples | 373x |
| RTX 2070S (Super)Nvidia $210Bench 115%, 663,603 samples | 97x |
| RTX 2060Nvidia $324Bench 90%, 645,160 samples | 76x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 105% - Outstanding | Total price: $639 |