HP Compaq 6200 Pro MT PC

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics5.69% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
SystemHP Compaq 6200 Pro MT PC  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 1497
Memory7.8 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1440 x 900 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20120620
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 30 '19 at 03:39
Run Duration142 Seconds
Run User ZAF-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2400-$250
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
73.2% Very good
Memory 88.8
1-Core 88.4
2-Core 172
69% 117 Pts
4-Core 335
8-Core 332
45% 333 Pts
64-Core 335
21% 335 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 73.2%
Great: 70%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-$101
Nvidia(10DE 1C81) 2GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 430.39
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
5.69% Terrible
Lighting 0.07
Reflection 26
Parallax 0.09
0% 8.72 fps
MRender 36.3
Gravity 33.5
Splatting 0.13
17% 23.3 fps
Poor: 24%
This bench: 5.69%
Great: 28%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD WD2500AVVS-61L2B0 250GB
6GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 30 25 25 27 25 26 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
17.4% Very poor
Read 33.6
Write 34.5
Mixed 25.6
SusWrite 26.4
22% 30 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.6
117% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 17.4%
Great: 35%
Seagate ST3500630AS 500GB-$102
267GB free
Firmware: 3.CH
SusWrite @10s intervals: 33 36 36 37 38 38 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 22% Great: 43%
WD USB Elements Device 500GB
284GB free, PID 6031
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 23 24 24 24 24 25 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
11.7% Very poor
Read 30.9
Write 19.5
Mixed 19
SusWrite 24.1
30% 23.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.6
43% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 11.7%
Great: 21%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B5173EB0-YK0 Hynix HMT351U6CFR8C-PB M378B5773DH0-CH9 M378B5773DH0-CH9 12GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 2048, 2048 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
49.7% Average
MC Read 16.8
MC Write 18.3
MC Mixed 15.4
48% 16.8 GB/s
SC Read 13.9
SC Write 16.1
SC Mixed 16.3
44% 15.4 GB/s
Latency 68.7
58% 68.7 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 49.7%
Great: 50%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Compaq 6200 Pro MT PC Builds (Compare 1,144 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk

System: HP Compaq 6200 Pro MT PC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 58% - Above average Total price: $278
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback