PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
Graphics | 5.69% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks. |
Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
Memory | 12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
System | HP Compaq 6200 Pro MT PC (all builds) |
Motherboard | Hewlett-Packard 1497 |
Memory | 7.8 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
Display | 1440 x 900 - 32 Bit couleurs |
OS | Windows 7 |
BIOS Date | 20120620 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Apr 30 '19 at 03:39 |
Run Duration | 142 Seconds |
Run User | ZAF-User |
Background CPU | 2% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
73.2%
Very good
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1050-$101
Nvidia(10DE 1C81) 2GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 430.39
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
5.69%
Terrible
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
WD WD2500AVVS-61L2B0 250GB
6GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 30 25 25 27 25 26 MB/s
|
17.4%
Very poor
|
|||
Seagate ST3500630AS 500GB-$102
267GB free
Firmware: 3.CH
SusWrite @10s intervals: 33 36 36 37 38 38 MB/s
|
||||
WD USB Elements Device 500GB
284GB free, PID 6031
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 23 24 24 24 24 25 MB/s
|
11.7%
Very poor
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung M378B5173EB0-YK0 Hynix HMT351U6CFR8C-PB M378B5773DH0-CH9 M378B5773DH0-CH9 12GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 2048, 2048 MB
|
49.7%
Average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i5-2400Intel $250Bench 61%, 166,255 samples | 489x |
Core i5-2500IntelBench 63%, 82,538 samples | 204x |
Core i7-2600Intel $188Bench 67%, 185,630 samples | 142x |
GPU | |
---|---|
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples | 392x |
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 99x |
GeForce GT 730NvidiaBench 5%, 164,888 samples | 58x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 58% - Above average | Total price: $278 |