| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
| Graphics | 29% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
| Motherboard | Asrock FM2A75 Pro4-M (all builds) |
| Memory | 5.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.8 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 7 |
| BIOS Date | 20130711 |
| Uptime | 0.1 Days |
| Run Date | Sep 25 '16 at 14:43 |
| Run Duration | 86 Seconds |
| Run User | GRC-User |
| Background CPU | 0% |
PC Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
58.3%
Above average
|
57% 92.5 Pts
|
27% 203 Pts
|
12% 202 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
29%
Poor
|
30% 35.3 fps
|
28% 34.4 fps
| |
| Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
94.2%
Outstanding
|
117% 156 MB/s
|
126% 1.24 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Unknown CT51264BA160BJ.C8F Micron 8JTF51264AZ-1G6E1 8GB
800, 800 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
32.5%
Below average
|
31% 10.9 GB/s
|
24% 8.37 GB/s
|
52% 77.1 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical FM2A75 Pro4-M Builds (Compare 35 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asrock FM2A75 Pro4-M
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| A10-5800K APU (2012 D.Tr)AMD $119Bench 50%, 18,312 samples | 9x |
| A8-5600K APUAMD $250Bench 49%, 14,744 samples | 8x |
| Athlon II X4 750KAMD $45Bench 51%, 5,882 samples | 4x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GeForce GT 710NvidiaBench 3%, 187,161 samples | 4x |
| Radeon HD 7540DAMDBench 3%, 4,337 samples | 3x |
| HD 7770AMDBench 12%, 38,053 samples | 3x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 54% - Above average | Total price: $148 |