Asus TUF X470-PLUS GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 63%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 113%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 106%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (73rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 27 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.9%, this CPUs suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics57.5% is a reasonable 3D score (GTX 1070 = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive263% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Run History
MotherboardAsus TUF X470-PLUS GAMING  (all builds)
Memory12.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190617
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJun 28 '19 at 21:36
Run Duration238 Seconds
Run User ARE-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Extreme
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X-$235
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
83.9% Excellent
1-Core 118
2-Core 236
83% 177 Pts
4-Core 472
8-Core 943
87% 707 Pts
64-Core 1,329
89% 1,329 Pts
Poor: 73%
This bench: 83.9%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$270
CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 430.86
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
57.5% Above average
Lighting 229
Reflection 203
Parallax 206
58% 212 fps
MRender 150
Gravity 213
Splatting 168
57% 177 fps
Poor: 50%
This bench: 57.5%
Great: 61%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$90
280GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 5,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 854 583 590 592 598 590 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
263% Outstanding
Read 2,520
Write 2,364
Mixed 1,644
SusWrite 634
400% 1,791 MB/s
4K Read 61.7
4K Write 138
4K Mixed 81.3
271% 93.7 MB/s
DQ Read 975
DQ Write 768
DQ Mixed 919
675% 888 MB/s
Poor: 206%
This bench: 263%
Great: 325%
Samsung 750 EVO 500GB
391GB free
Firmware: MAT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 494 368 329 329 329 329 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
123% Outstanding
Read 505
Write 493
Mixed 349
SusWrite 363
96% 428 MB/s
4K Read 44.7
4K Write 114
4K Mixed 60.4
205% 72.9 MB/s
DQ Read 386
DQ Write 362
DQ Mixed 351
270% 366 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 123%
Great: 123%
WDC WDS2 40G2G0A-00JH 240GB
205GB free
Firmware: UF45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 157 96 107 116 129 132 MB/s
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
43.1% Average
Read 384
Write 150
Mixed 132
SusWrite 123
43% 197 MB/s
4K Read 18.3
4K Write 22
4K Mixed 12.4
55% 17.6 MB/s
DQ Read 109
DQ Write 56
DQ Mixed 24.7
34% 63.3 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 43.1%
Great: 47%
Seagate Momentus Thin 5400.9 2.5" 500GB-$25
418GB free
Firmware: 0002LVM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 110 110 110 110 110 110 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
64.3% Good
Read 114
Write 106
Mixed 52
SusWrite 110
70% 95.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.6
102% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 64.3%
Great: 61%
WD Elements 1TB
187GB free, PID 1078
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 58 57 57 57 55 57 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
27.3% Poor
Read 63.8
Write 65.5
Mixed 42.5
SusWrite 56.9
77% 57.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.9
94% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 27.3%
Great: 44%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
G.SKILL Trident Z RGB DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB-$105
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
106% Outstanding
MC Read 43.2
MC Write 39.1
MC Mixed 32.8
110% 38.4 GB/s
SC Read 26.5
SC Write 39.8
SC Mixed 29.3
91% 31.9 GB/s
Latency 68.3
59% 68.3 ns
Poor: 58%
This bench: 106%
Great: 109%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds (explanation by AdoredTV).

Typical TUF X470-PLUS GAMING Builds (Compare 3,511 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 60%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 112%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 98%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Asus TUF X470-PLUS GAMING

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 80% - Excellent Total price: $573
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9400F $143Nvidia GTX 1660 $220Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $86
Intel Core i5-9600K $219Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti $270Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $102
AMD Ryzen 5 3600 $196AMD RX 580 $173Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $195
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $75SanDisk Extreme 64GB $88
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $42G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $799SanDisk Extreme 32GB $48
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $75Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $80SanDisk Extreme 16GB $24
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback