Gigabyte X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 100%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 101%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (87th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 13 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics111% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive252% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemGigabyte X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING
MotherboardGigabyte X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING  (all builds)
Memory28.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180808
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 20 '19 at 18:37
Run Duration233 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU3%
Watch Gameplay: 2070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X-$210
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
86.9% Excellent
Memory 80.7
1-Core 129
2-Core 253
85% 154 Pts
4-Core 499
8-Core 951
86% 725 Pts
64-Core 1,342
83% 1,342 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 86.9%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070-$200
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 431.36
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
111% Outstanding
Lighting 144
Reflection 128
Parallax 144
117% 139 fps
MRender 178
Gravity 131
Splatting 103
109% 138 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 111%
Great: 112%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$46
163GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1381 396 400 398 396 398 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
252% Outstanding
Read 2,442
Write 2,245
Mixed 1,513
SusWrite 561
377% 1,690 MB/s
4K Read 56.2
4K Write 139
4K Mixed 79.1
260% 91.5 MB/s
DQ Read 990
DQ Write 768
DQ Mixed 927
681% 895 MB/s
Poor: 152%
This bench: 252%
Great: 302%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94
263GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 491 490 491 492 492 488 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
131% Outstanding
Read 504
Write 490
Mixed 402
SusWrite 490
106% 472 MB/s
4K Read 45.2
4K Write 108
4K Mixed 61.4
204% 71.6 MB/s
DQ Read 385
DQ Write 362
DQ Mixed 369
278% 372 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 131%
Great: 134%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016)-$51
1.5TB free
Firmware: CC26
SusWrite @10s intervals: 179 192 193 193 192 193 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
111% Outstanding
Read 196
Write 151
Mixed 81.8
SusWrite 190
113% 155 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
150% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 111%
Great: 114%
Seagate Momentus 5400.6 2.5" 500GB-$22
359GB free
Firmware: 0003BSM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 71 72 72 72 72 72 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
40.9% Average
Read 70.8
Write 68.7
Mixed 39.2
SusWrite 71.8
46% 62.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.6
100% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 40.9%
Great: 43%
WD Blue 250GB (2007)-$20
205GB free
Firmware: 01.01B01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 88 89 90 89 90 89 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
50.9% Above average
Read 87.8
Write 90
Mixed 58.5
SusWrite 89.2
60% 81.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1
190% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 50.9%
Great: 55%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KHX3000C15D4/8GX KHX3000C15D4/8GX BLS8G4D30AESBK.M8FE BLS8G4D30AESBK.M8FE 32GB
2400, 2400, 2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
85.2% Excellent
MC Read 33
MC Write 30.8
MC Mixed 27.5
87% 30.4 GB/s
SC Read 23.4
SC Write 31.9
SC Mixed 25.6
77% 27 GB/s
Latency 79.3
50% 79.3 ns
Poor: 81%
This bench: 85.2%
Great: 85%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING-CF Builds (Compare 4,635 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 82%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 80%
Battleship

Motherboard: Gigabyte X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING - $140

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 96% - Outstanding Total price: $666
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $290Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback