Asus TUF Z370-PLUS GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 41%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics45.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus TUF Z370-PLUS GAMING  (all builds)
Memory6.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20171101
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 21 '19 at 05:28
Run Duration140 Seconds
Run User PER-User
Background CPU 18%
Watch Gameplay: 1650 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-8100-$110
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
86.4% Excellent
Memory 93.2
1-Core 115
2-Core 234
84% 147 Pts
4-Core 460
8-Core 464
62% 462 Pts
64-Core 456
28% 456 Pts
Poor: 53%
This bench: 86.4%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650-$155
Asus(1043 86B6) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 431.36
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
45.5% Average
Lighting 58.9
Reflection 56.3
Parallax 49.2
48% 54.8 fps
MRender 45.5
Gravity 52
Splatting 50.8
41% 49.4 fps
Poor: 39%
This bench: 45.5%
Great: 46%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Ccdisk iSCSI 2TB
1TB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 24 24 26 26 25 27 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
25.5% Poor
Read 295
Write 124
Mixed 118
SusWrite 25.2
31% 141 MB/s
4K Read 4
4K Write 30.9
4K Mixed 12.2
38% 15.7 MB/s
DQ Read 4.5
DQ Write 0.1
DQ Mixed 0.3
1% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 25.5%
Great: 71%
Amd-raid WDC WDS240G2G0B- 240GB
196GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UJ190000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 26 26 26 26 26 27 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
9.1% Terrible
Read 2.7
Write 1.7
Mixed 86.3
SusWrite 26.2
23% 29.2 MB/s
4K Read 8.7
4K Write 0.1
4K Mixed 0.1
376% 2.97 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 9.1%
Great: 166%
Ccdisk iSCSI 250GB
186GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 26 25 26 26 26 27 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 14% Great: 49%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BLS8G4D240FSBK.8FBR 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
44.7% Average
MC Read 16.4
MC Write 16.2
MC Mixed 12.5
43% 15 GB/s
SC Read 12.2
SC Write 13.1
SC Mixed 12.3
36% 12.5 GB/s
Latency 61.7
65% 61.7 ns
Poor: 12%
This bench: 44.7%
Great: 45%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF Z370-PLUS GAMING Builds (Compare 4,377 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 93%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 85%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asus TUF Z370-PLUS GAMING - $135

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 101% - Outstanding Total price: $646
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback