Asus M52AD_M12AD_A_F_K31AD

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics5.47% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive115% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
SystemAsus M52AD_M12AD_A_F_K31AD  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK M52AD_M12AD_A_F_K31AD
Memory13.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920x1080x4294967296 szín
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20141204
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateJul 28 '19 at 12:03
Run Duration154 Seconds
Run User HUN-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4790-$135
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
82% Excellent
Memory 92
1-Core 120
2-Core 222
83% 145 Pts
4-Core 389
8-Core 602
61% 495 Pts
64-Core 604
37% 604 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 82%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 730
Asus(1043 0862) 2GB
CLim: 901 MHz, MLim: 450 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 431.36
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
5.47% Terrible
Lighting 6.8
Reflection 7.27
Parallax 8.03
6% 7.37 fps
MRender 4.81
Gravity 7.23
Splatting 7.09
5% 6.38 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.47%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$130
858GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 399 431 406 428 418 422 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
115% Outstanding
Read 425
Write 406
Mixed 394
SusWrite 417
93% 411 MB/s
4K Read 39.6
4K Write 97.6
4K Mixed 55
182% 64.1 MB/s
DQ Read 344
DQ Write 345
DQ Mixed 48
118% 246 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 115%
Great: 133%
Toshiba DT01ACA200 2TB-$50
310GB free
Firmware: ABB0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 118 117 123 123 123 122 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
69% Good
Read 119
Write 123
Mixed 22.1
SusWrite 121
70% 96.4 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.7
160% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 69%
Great: 108%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$31
739GB free
Firmware: A7L0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 123 130 131 131 131 131 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
75% Very good
Read 132
Write 111
Mixed 36.7
SusWrite 130
74% 102 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.7
138% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 75%
Great: 107%
Sony Storage Media 16GB
1GB free, PID 09c2
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.6 8.9 9 9.4 6.3 8.9 MB/s
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
16.8% Very poor
Read 97.1
Write 19.7
Mixed 33.8
SusWrite 8.6
41% 39.8 MB/s
4K Read 3.6
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 1.7
71% 1.77 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 16.8%
Great: 31%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown Samsung M378B1G73DB0-CK0 16GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
59.7% Above average
MC Read 22.1
MC Write 20.9
MC Mixed 17.5
58% 20.2 GB/s
SC Read 16.6
SC Write 22.1
SC Mixed 21.3
57% 20 GB/s
Latency 64.1
62% 64.1 ns
Poor: 23%
This bench: 59.7%
Great: 60%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M52AD_M12AD_A_F_K31AD Builds (Compare 532 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: Asus M52AD_M12AD_A_F_K31AD

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 63% - Good Total price: $222
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback