Asus TUF H310M-PLUS GAMING

Performance Results


Gaming 97% Nuclear submarine	Desktop 91% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 82% Aircraft carrier


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (73rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 27 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 91.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	104% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	95.2% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus TUF H310M-PLUS GAMING (all builds)
Memory	13.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180620
Uptime	2 Days
Run Date	Sep 19 '19 at 10:27
Run Duration	126 Seconds
Run User	FRA-User
Background CPU	2%

Watch Gameplay: 2070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-8400-$131 312,220 User benchmarks, average bench 82% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	91.6% Outstanding	Memory 91.2 1-Core 125 2-Core 247 87% 154 Pts	4-Core 495 8-Core 732 76% 614 Pts	64-Core 732 45% 732 Pts
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 91.6% Great: 89%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070-$200 478,117 User benchmarks, average bench 104% Asus(1043 866D) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 430.86 Performing below potential (60^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	104% Outstanding	Lighting 129 Reflection 119 Parallax 135 105% 128 fps	MRender 175 Gravity 125 Splatting 99.5 105% 133 fps
Poor: 93% ↑ This bench: 104% Great: 112%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80 762,998 User benchmarks, average bench 105% 63GB free (System drive) Firmware: RVT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 303 303 303 301 296 287 MB/s Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)	95.2% Outstanding	Read 466 Write 308 Mixed 286 SusWrite 299 76% 340 MB/s	4K Read 32 4K Write 92.7 4K Mixed 35.5 143% 53.4 MB/s	DQ Read 369 DQ Write 300 DQ Mixed 245 208% 305 MB/s
Poor: 74% ↑ This bench: 95.2% Great: 129%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$39 1,120,098 User benchmarks, average bench 92% 768GB free Firmware: CC43 SusWrite @10s intervals: 195 200 200 200 200 200 MB/s Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	115% Outstanding	Read 203 Write 200 Mixed 82.7 SusWrite 199 125% 171 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.8 158% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 115% Great: 113%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial CT8G4DFS824A.C8FHD1 2x8GB 3,272 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing above expectations (79^th percentile)	76.5% Very good	MC Read 30.2 MC Write 29.3 MC Mixed 21.7 77% 27.1 GB/s	SC Read 17.1 SC Write 28.1 SC Mixed 23.5 65% 22.9 GB/s	Latency 65.5 61% 65.5 ns
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 76.5% Great: 86%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF H310M-PLUS GAMING Builds (Compare 813 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 52%

Yacht

Desktop 87%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 44%

Speed boat

Motherboard: Asus TUF H310M-PLUS GAMING

CPU
Core i5-9400FIntel $102Bench 85%, 299,482 samples	192x
Core i5-8400Intel $131Bench 82%, 312,220 samples	181x
Core i7-8700Intel $200Bench 87%, 349,567 samples	128x

GPU
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	78x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	64x
RTX 2060Nvidia $324Bench 90%, 645,160 samples	62x

SSD
WDS240G2G0B-00EPW0 240GBWDCBench 45%, 85,321 samples	35x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	33x
Green 240GB (2018)WD $42Bench 45%, 156,194 samples	31x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2666 C16 2x8GBCorsair $42Bench 77%, 131,007 samples	32x
HyperX 2400 C15 2x8GBKingstonBench 76%, 122,822 samples	25x
Fury 2666 C16 2x8GBHyperX $75Bench 82%, 134,977 samples	21x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 119% - Outstanding

Total price: $260

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16