Performance Results


Gaming 30% Raft	Desktop 82% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 25% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	32.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	98.5% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	HP Z230 Tower Workstation (all builds)
Motherboard	Hewlett-Packard 1905
Memory	12.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20131018
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Oct 23 '19 at 19:55
Run Duration	147 Seconds
Run User	CAN-User
Background CPU	3%

PC Performing as expected (55^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E3-1245 v3-$245 2,834 User benchmarks, average bench 71% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	79.7% Very good	Memory 81.5 1-Core 107 2-Core 214 76% 134 Pts	4-Core 426 8-Core 569 63% 497 Pts	64-Core 565 35% 565 Pts
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 79.7% Great: 81%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 960-$198 440,282 User benchmarks, average bench 33% Gigabyte(1458 36BE) CLim: 1455 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 419.35 Performing below potential (65^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	32.7% Below average	Lighting 40.7 Reflection 38.2 Parallax 30.8 33% 36.6 fps	MRender 39.3 Gravity 40.8 Splatting 36.5 32% 38.9 fps
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 32.7% Great: 36%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$52 296,814 User benchmarks, average bench 104% 115GB free (System drive) Firmware: RVT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 237 285 293 290 290 292 MB/s Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)	98.5% Outstanding	Read 460 Write 314 Mixed 306 SusWrite 281 76% 340 MB/s	4K Read 31.8 4K Write 117 4K Mixed 36.7 157% 61.9 MB/s	DQ Read 382 DQ Write 313 DQ Mixed 250 214% 315 MB/s
Poor: 75% ↑ This bench: 98.5% Great: 128%
WD Black 1TB (2010)-$49 257,835 User benchmarks, average bench 57% 270GB free Firmware: 05.01D05 SusWrite @10s intervals: 108 110 111 112 112 111 MB/s Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)	62% Good	Read 105 Write 94.7 Mixed 97.7 SusWrite 110 76% 102 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 2.5 4K Mixed 0.9 184% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 62% Great: 76%
Generic USB SD Reader 32GB 94 User benchmarks, average bench 12% 9GB free, PID 0310 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.7 9.3 9.4 9.4 9.5 9.6 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	5.38% Terrible	Read 16.3 Write 9.5 Mixed 6.5 SusWrite 9.3 13% 10.4 MB/s	4K Read 4.2 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 16% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 5.38% Great: 19%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M391B5273CH0-CH9 M391B5273DH0-CK0 M391B5273CH0-CH9 M391B5273DH0-CK0 16GB 9 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB Performing as expected (57^th percentile)	48.1% Average	MC Read 16 MC Write 17.5 MC Mixed 14.6 46% 16 GB/s	SC Read 14.2 SC Write 19.7 SC Mixed 17.2 49% 17 GB/s	Latency 77.8 51% 77.8 ns
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 48.1% Great: 49%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 65%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 230,189 samples	234x
Quadro K2000NvidiaBench 7%, 13,526 samples	173x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	161x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	121x
MTFDDAK256MBF-1AN1ZABHA 256GBCrucialBench 89%, 2,574 samples	56x
C400 RealSSD 256GBMicronBench 55%, 11,652 samples	46x

RAM
16JTF1G64AZ-1G6E1 2x8GBMicronBench 53%, 7,464 samples	57x
HMT41GU6BFR8C-PB 2x8GBHynixBench 54%, 3,233 samples	51x
8JTF51264AZ-1G6E1 4x4GBMicronBench 56%, 6,584 samples	45x

Value: 74% - Very good

Total price: $178

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $79	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16