Asus PRIME X470-PRO

Performance Results


Gaming 20% Surfboard	Desktop 72% Battleship	Workstation 20% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (27th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 73 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	16.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	160% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (85%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus PRIME X470-PRO (all builds)
Memory	24 GB free of 32 GB @ 3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit couleurs
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190307
Uptime	0.3 Days
Run Date	Nov 06 '19 at 05:45
Run Duration	206 Seconds
Run User	NLD-User
Background CPU	85%

PC Performing below expectations (27^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X-$210 159,077 User benchmarks, average bench 76% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	66.8% Good	Memory 72.6 1-Core 80.4 2-Core 165 61% 106 Pts	4-Core 328 8-Core 637 57% 482 Pts	64-Core 1,127 70% 1,127 Pts
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 66.8% Great: 89%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-Ti-$92 309,423 User benchmarks, average bench 17% Asus(1043 84AC) 2GB CLim: 1346 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 436.15 Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)	16.3% Very poor	Lighting 19.9 Reflection 16.5 Parallax 19.5 16% 18.6 fps	MRender 24.2 Gravity 21.3 Splatting 16.4 16% 20.6 fps
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 16.3% Great: 19%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$45 240,629 User benchmarks, average bench 199% 109GB free (System drive) Firmware: 3B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 580 264 256 255 252 249 MB/s Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	160% Outstanding	Read 1,690 Write 1,251 Mixed 557 SusWrite 309 210% 952 MB/s	4K Read 30 4K Write 63.6 4K Mixed 37.9 128% 43.8 MB/s	DQ Read 882 DQ Write 649 DQ Mixed 676 530% 736 MB/s
Poor: 142% ↑ This bench: 160% Great: 236%
Kingston SUV500M8240G 240GB 3,393 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 185GB free Firmware: 003056RI SusWrite @10s intervals: 265 120 72 114 147 103 MB/s Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)	67.5% Good	Read 440 Write 402 Mixed 352 SusWrite 137 74% 333 MB/s	4K Read 27.7 4K Write 47.9 4K Mixed 32.4 109% 36 MB/s	DQ Read 179 DQ Write 161 DQ Mixed 144 115% 161 MB/s
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 67.5% Great: 90%
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 74GB free Firmware: EMT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 328 73 45 37 32 32 MB/s Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	67% Good	Read 449 Write 423 Mixed 375 SusWrite 91 75% 335 MB/s	4K Read 31.1 4K Write 54.3 4K Mixed 31.4 116% 38.9 MB/s	DQ Read 182 DQ Write 165 DQ Mixed 178 132% 175 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 67% Great: 124%
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2017)-$79 179,101 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 1.5TB free Firmware: 0001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 56 92 75 65 80 77 MB/s Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	35% Below average	Read 47.5 Write 70.5 Mixed 65 SusWrite 74.1 48% 64.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.4 117% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 35% Great: 90%
WD Green 2TB (2009)-$113 12,948 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 817GB free Firmware: 01.00A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 82 83 82 84 84 84 MB/s Performing as expected (59^th percentile)	48.4% Average	Read 85 Write 79.7 Mixed 60.5 SusWrite 83.2 57% 77.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 2.7 4K Mixed 0.8 160% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 48.4% Great: 60%
Seagate Barracuda 8TB (2017)-$87 42,465 User benchmarks, average bench 69% 3.5TB free Firmware: 0001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 145 147 146 150 152 148 MB/s Performing as expected (47^th percentile)	68.8% Good	Read 90.5 Write 126 Mixed 65.7 SusWrite 148 79% 108 MB/s	4K Read 1.4 4K Write 5.1 4K Mixed 0.6 219% 2.37 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 68.8% Great: 90%
Generic STORAGE DEVICE 64GB 1,176 User benchmarks, average bench 29% 11GB free, PID 0743 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 104 Write 72 Mixed 32.5 79% 69.5 MB/s	4K Read 3.7 4K Write 1.1 4K Mixed 1.4 99% 2.07 MB/s
Poor: 11% Great: 44%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3000 C16 4x8GB 19,774 User benchmarks, average bench 85% 4 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 3000 MHz clocked @ 1500 MHz Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)	89.6% Excellent	MC Read 38 MC Write 33.9 MC Mixed 33.9 101% 35.3 GB/s	SC Read 12.1 SC Write 15.5 SC Mixed 16.6 42% 14.7 GB/s	Latency 95.5 42% 95.5 ns
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 89.6% Great: 104%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical PRIME X470-PRO Builds (Compare 5,561 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 83%

Aircraft carrier

Desktop 85%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 81%

Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asus PRIME X470-PRO - $139

CPU
Ryzen 7 2700XAMD $210Bench 76%, 159,077 samples	1,949x
Ryzen 5 2600XAMD $120Bench 74%, 142,983 samples	436x
Ryzen 5 2600AMD $155Bench 73%, 179,588 samples	403x

GPU
RTX 2070Nvidia $200Bench 104%, 478,117 samples	285x
RTX 2070S (Super)Nvidia $210Bench 115%, 663,603 samples	283x
RTX 2060Nvidia $324Bench 90%, 645,160 samples	247x

SSD
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 273%, 381,216 samples	285x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	228x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	213x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	278x
Trident Z RGB DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $55Bench 84%, 215,644 samples	231x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $45Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	222x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 107% - Outstanding

Total price: $635

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $124	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Asus PRIME X470-PRO

Performance Results

Run History

PC Performing below expectations (27th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Motherboard: Asus PRIME X470-PRO - $139

Feedback

PC Performing below expectations (27^th percentile)