Performance Results


Gaming 8% Tree trunk	Desktop 69% Battle cruiser	Workstation 8% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	3.91% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	94.3% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	HP Compaq 8200 Elite CMT PC (all builds)
Motherboard	Hewlett-Packard 1494
Memory	12.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20110609
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Nov 14 '19 at 19:27
Run Duration	149 Seconds
Run User	AUT-User
Background CPU	2%

PC Performing as expected (50^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-2600-$187 185,630 User benchmarks, average bench 67% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)	72.3% Very good	Memory 90.7 1-Core 97.6 2-Core 190 74% 126 Pts	4-Core 292 8-Core 466 47% 379 Pts	64-Core 440 27% 440 Pts
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 72.3% Great: 74%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 710 187,161 User benchmarks, average bench 3% Asus(1043 8572) 2GB CLim: 954 MHz, MLim: 450 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 388.13 Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	3.91% Terrible	Lighting 4.67 Reflection 4.38 Parallax 4.28 4% 4.44 fps	MRender 4.62 Gravity 3.9 Splatting 6.13 4% 4.88 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 3.91% Great: 4%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 132GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 395 311 307 294 294 302 MB/s Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)	94.3% Outstanding	Read 471 Write 400 Mixed 361 SusWrite 317 87% 387 MB/s	4K Read 31.7 4K Write 55.5 4K Mixed 40.1 129% 42.4 MB/s	DQ Read 372 DQ Write 336 DQ Mixed 348 263% 352 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 94.3% Great: 124%
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$95 217,115 User benchmarks, average bench 96% 153GB free Firmware: EXT0DB6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 241 239 241 238 240 240 MB/s Performing below potential (8^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	68.1% Good	Read 248 Write 165 Mixed 204 SusWrite 240 48% 214 MB/s	4K Read 29.1 4K Write 43.9 4K Mixed 34.4 111% 35.8 MB/s	DQ Read 199 DQ Write 189 DQ Mixed 166 132% 185 MB/s
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 68.1% Great: 118%
USB 500GB 123 User benchmarks, average bench 40% 142GB free Firmware: 0204 SusWrite @10s intervals: 27 26 27 27 27 27 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	15.3% Very poor	Read 26.2 Write 19 Mixed 18.1 SusWrite 26.9 17% 22.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 0.6 4K Mixed 0.6 94% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 15.3% Great: 61%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston KHX1866C9D3/4GX Samsung M378B5273DH0-CK0 KHX1866C9D3/4GX Micron 16JTF51264AZ-1G6M1 16GB 6 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	48.6% Average	MC Read 16.8 MC Write 16.7 MC Mixed 14.9 46% 16.1 GB/s	SC Read 14.9 SC Write 17.1 SC Mixed 16.6 46% 16.2 GB/s	Latency 66.2 60% 66.2 ns
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 48.6% Great: 49%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 57%

Gunboat

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples	423x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	137x
GTX 1050Nvidia $101Bench 26%, 269,381 samples	86x

RAM
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	22x
HMT351U7BFR8C-H9 HMT351U6CFR8C-H9 HMT351U7BFR8C-H9 HMT351U6CFR8C-H9 16GBHynixBench 49%, 20 samples	14x
M378B5773DH0-CH9 2x2GBSamsungBench 45%, 4,605 samples	11x

Value: 58% - Above average

Total price: $278

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16