HP Compaq 8200 Elite CMT PC

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics3.55% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive83% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemHP Compaq 8200 Elite CMT PC  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 1494
Memory9.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150324
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 18 '20 at 22:56
Run Duration293 Seconds
Run User AUT-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing below expectations (28th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2600-$172
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
64.5% Good
Memory 74.7
1-Core 93.2
2-Core 176
66% 114 Pts
4-Core 293
8-Core 438
46% 366 Pts
64-Core 460
28% 460 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 64.5%
Great: 74%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 710
Asus(1043 8572) 2GB
CLim: 954 MHz, MLim: 450 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
3.55% Terrible
Lighting 4.3
Reflection 4.4
Parallax 4.5
4% 4.4 fps
MRender 4.4
Gravity 3.9
Splatting 4.9
4% 4.4 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.55%
Great: 4%
Intel HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)
HP(103C 1494) 2GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4459
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
0.96% Terrible
Lighting 1.1
Reflection 1.7
Parallax 1.3
1% 1.37 fps
MRender 2
Gravity 0.5
Splatting 1.5
1% 1.33 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 0.96%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk S3 1T00 1TB
720GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 415000RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 368 334 351 357 345 352 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
83% Excellent
Read 331
Write 403
Mixed 229
SusWrite 351
74% 328 MB/s
4K Read 24.1
4K Write 50.2
4K Mixed 33.1
106% 35.8 MB/s
DQ Read 371
DQ Write 316
DQ Mixed 250
213% 312 MB/s
Poor: 65%
This bench: 83%
Great: 118%
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
232GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 388 303 316 316 315 314 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
93.6% Outstanding
Read 470
Write 445
Mixed 316
SusWrite 325
87% 389 MB/s
4K Read 28.7
4K Write 64.8
4K Mixed 36.4
124% 43.3 MB/s
DQ Read 384
DQ Write 347
DQ Mixed 358
270% 363 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 93.6%
Great: 124%
PNY CS3030 500GB SSD
187GB free
Firmware: CS303226
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1083 668 529 532 555 533 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
115% Outstanding
Read 766
Write 535
Mixed 493
SusWrite 650
137% 611 MB/s
4K Read 16.2
4K Write 89.5
4K Mixed 26.8
106% 44.2 MB/s
DQ Read 97.8
DQ Write 463
DQ Mixed 505
323% 355 MB/s
Poor: 119%
This bench: 115%
Great: 266%
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$70
79GB free
Firmware: EXT0DB6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 234 223 237 238 232 241 MB/s
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
65.9% Good
Read 247
Write 234
Mixed 235
SusWrite 234
54% 238 MB/s
4K Read 28.6
4K Write 43.1
4K Mixed 31.4
106% 34.4 MB/s
DQ Read 198
DQ Write 192
DQ Mixed 174
137% 188 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 65.9%
Great: 118%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KHX1866C9D3/4GX Samsung M378B5273DH0-CK0 KHX1866C9D3/4GX Micron 16JTF51264AZ-1G6M1 16GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
43.7% Average
MC Read 14.1
MC Write 16.2
MC Mixed 14.4
43% 14.9 GB/s
SC Read 13.2
SC Write 14.2
SC Mixed 15.7
41% 14.4 GB/s
Latency 90.9
44% 90.9 ns
Poor: 44%
This bench: 43.7%
Great: 49%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Compaq 8200 Elite CMT PC Builds (Compare 1,776 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: HP Compaq 8200 Elite CMT PC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 58% - Above average Total price: $278
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $44SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback