Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 109%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 125%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 93.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics114% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive168% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (65%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory59.1 GB free of 64 GB @ 3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190801
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 15 '19 at 17:08
Run Duration245 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 65%
Watch Gameplay: 2080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 3900X-$370
AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
93.3% Outstanding
Memory 80.7
1-Core 141
2-Core 282
91% 168 Pts
4-Core 566
8-Core 1,129
100% 847 Pts
64-Core 2,135
132% 2,135 Pts
Poor: 80%
This bench: 93.3%
Great: 97%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-$270
Nvidia(10DE 1E82) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 441.12
Performing below potential (14th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
114% Outstanding
Lighting 145
Reflection 161
Parallax 175
118% 160 fps
MRender 183
Gravity 142
Splatting 110
114% 145 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 114%
Great: 134%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SMI 2263XT 1TB
284GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S0318B0G
SusWrite @10s intervals: 405 534 619 259 905 459 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
168% Outstanding
Read 1351
Write 796
Mixed 877
SusWrite 530
198% 888 MB/s
4K Read 43.6
4K Write 144
4K Mixed 25
174% 70.9 MB/s
DQ Read 910
DQ Write 513
DQ Mixed 182
277% 535 MB/s
Poor: 157%
This bench: 168%
Great: 319%
Amd-raid NT-1TB 1TB
889GB free
Firmware: T180
SusWrite @10s intervals: 145 154 154 163 165 162 MB/s
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
57.2% Above average
Read 357
Write 260
Mixed 260
SusWrite 157
58% 259 MB/s
4K Read 9.2
4K Write 60.1
4K Mixed 27
80% 32.1 MB/s
DQ Read 109
DQ Write 238
DQ Mixed 148
120% 165 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 57.2%
Great: 63%
Amd-raid Array 4 960GB
871GB free
Firmware: 9.2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 157 161 163 175 176 173 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
31.7% Below average
Read 160
Write 316
Mixed 221
SusWrite 167
49% 216 MB/s
4K Read 3.7
4K Write 44.8
4K Mixed 7.2
38% 18.6 MB/s
DQ Read 42.1
DQ Write 125
DQ Mixed 45.7
46% 70.9 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 31.7%
Great: 79%
Seagate Backup+ Hub BK 8TB
4TB free
Firmware: D781
SusWrite @10s intervals: 147 153 160 165 165 159 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
81.3% Excellent
Read 124
Write 154
Mixed 33.5
SusWrite 158
85% 117 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 7.1
4K Mixed 0.7
251% 2.93 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 81.3%
Great: 92%
Amd-raid Maxtor 6Y160M0 164GB
152GB free
Firmware: YAR5
SusWrite @10s intervals: 55 56 56 57 57 57 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
26.3% Poor
Read 34.8
Write 57.8
Mixed 32.3
SusWrite 56.3
33% 45.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.8
142% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 26.3%
Great: 26%
Amd-raid Array 1 2TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 9.2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 149 158 154 163 162 163 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
84.4% Excellent
Read 136
Write 191
Mixed 88.8
SusWrite 158
105% 143 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 3.9
4K Mixed 0.7
188% 1.83 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 84.4%
Great: 212%
Amd-raid Hitachi HDS72101 1TB
326GB free
Firmware: JP4O
SusWrite @10s intervals: 61 67 65 72 71 72 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
53.3% Above average
Read 118
Write 65.3
Mixed 30.2
SusWrite 68
51% 70.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.8
144% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 53.3%
Great: 74%
Generic- SD/MMC 253GB
211GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 13 10 15 15 16 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
13.5% Very poor
Read 19
Write 15.8
Mixed 15
SusWrite 13.4
21% 15.8 MB/s
4K Read 4.3
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 2.6
179% 3.03 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 13.5%
Great: 14%
Maxtor OneTouch 750GB
297GB free, PID 7310
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 40 40 40 40 40 40 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
18% Very poor
Read 37.5
Write 21.2
Mixed 28
SusWrite 39.9
42% 31.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.5
60% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 18%
Great: 19%
NORELSYS 106X 1TB
388GB free, PID 1066
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 39 40 40 40 41 40 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
30.6% Below average
Read 38.7
Write 39.7
Mixed 30.8
SusWrite 40.2
51% 37.3 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 5.2
4K Mixed 1.5
232% 2.57 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 30.6%
Great: 71%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata DDR4 3000 2OZ 4x16GB
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3000 MHz
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
104% Outstanding
MC Read 41.8
MC Write 36.6
MC Mixed 37.9
111% 38.8 GB/s
SC Read 24.9
SC Write 22.3
SC Mixed 35.6
79% 27.6 GB/s
Latency 79.3
50% 79.3 ns
Poor: 77%
This bench: 104%
Great: 162%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS Builds (Compare 6,892 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS - $185

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $1,009
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $289WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback