Asus PRIME H310M-K R2.0

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 55%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 45%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics68.9% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (46%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus PRIME H310M-K R2.0  (all builds)
Memory3 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20190807
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateDec 12 '19 at 13:52
Run Duration131 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU 46%
Watch Gameplay How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-9400F-$85
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
85.3% Excellent
Memory 88
1-Core 125
2-Core 245
85% 153 Pts
4-Core 463
8-Core 552
66% 507 Pts
64-Core 628
39% 628 Pts
Poor: 72%
This bench: 85.3%
Great: 91%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 441.8
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
68.9% Good
Lighting 76.6
Reflection 77.2
Parallax 67.4
62% 73.7 fps
MRender 127
Gravity 110
Splatting 73
81% 103 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 68.9%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
52netbar iShareDisk 240GB
169GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 35 37 34 36 35 35 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
32.6% Below average
Read 75.8
Write 74.5
Mixed 71.3
SusWrite 35.3
48% 64.2 MB/s
4K Read 4.5
4K Write 4.7
4K Mixed 4.3
752% 4.5 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 32.6%
Great: 33%
52netbar iShareDisk 3.5TB
405GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 37 39 37 36 36 36 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
29% Poor
Read 61.8
Write 73
Mixed 71.3
SusWrite 36.7
46% 60.7 MB/s
4K Read 4.4
4K Write 4.4
4K Mixed 5.7
898% 4.83 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 29%
Great: 29%
52netbar iShareDisk 500GB
42GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 18 27 26 33 35 31 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
19.6% Very poor
Read 39.3
Write 57.8
Mixed 42.7
SusWrite 28.2
31% 42 MB/s
4K Read 1.9
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 3.7
511% 2.23 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 19.6%
Great: 38%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata DDR4 2400 2OZ 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (20th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
37.4% Below average
MC Read 13.5
MC Write 12.9
MC Mixed 10.9
36% 12.4 GB/s
SC Read 9.4
SC Write 11.3
SC Mixed 11
30% 10.6 GB/s
Latency 69.6
58% 69.6 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 37.4%
Great: 48%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PRIME H310M-K R2.0 Builds (Compare 7,228 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asus PRIME H310M-K R2.0

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 81% - Excellent Total price: $339
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $168Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback