Asrock Z390 Pro4

Performance Results


Gaming 37% Jet ski	Desktop 94% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 36% Jet ski


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 90.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	31.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	226% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (32%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago.

Motherboard	Asrock Z390 Pro4 (all builds)
Memory	27.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 3 GHz
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190812
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Dec 13 '19 at 00:17
Run Duration	267 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	32%

Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (51^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i9-9900K-$410 354,223 User benchmarks, average bench 98% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	90.2% Outstanding	Memory 95.1 1-Core 115 2-Core 228 84% 146 Pts	4-Core 458 8-Core 886 80% 672 Pts	64-Core 1,246 77% 1,246 Pts
Poor: 89% ↑ This bench: 90.2% Great: 104%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% Gigabyte(1458 3732) CLim: 1936 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 436.2 Performing way above expectations (85^th percentile)	31.3% Below average	Lighting 38.6 Reflection 31.5 Parallax 37.6 32% 35.9 fps	MRender 38 Gravity 38.7 Splatting 36.9 31% 37.9 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 31.3% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43 165,668 User benchmarks, average bench 213% 161GB free (System drive) Firmware: 3B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 719 635 638 628 546 485 MB/s Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)	226% Outstanding	Read 1972 Write 1,695 Mixed 809 SusWrite 608 283% 1,271 MB/s	4K Read 47.9 4K Write 122 4K Mixed 64.4 220% 78.1 MB/s	DQ Read 1,018 DQ Write 851 DQ Mixed 754 614% 874 MB/s
Poor: 153% ↑ This bench: 226% Great: 254%
SanDisk SSD Plus 960GB-$90 2,663 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 648GB free Firmware: Z33080RL SusWrite @10s intervals: 426 430 316 164 154 174 MB/s Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)	69.6% Good	Read 452 Write 424 Mixed 378 SusWrite 277 86% 383 MB/s	4K Read 16.3 4K Write 72.3 4K Mixed 15.7 83% 34.8 MB/s	DQ Read 156 DQ Write 299 DQ Mixed 34.3 81% 163 MB/s
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 69.6% Great: 78%
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43 165,668 User benchmarks, average bench 213% 416GB free Firmware: 3B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1706 972 600 600 600 597 MB/s Performing above expectations (79^th percentile)	237% Outstanding	Read 1,984 Write 1,773 Mixed 937 SusWrite 846 309% 1,385 MB/s	4K Read 40.8 4K Write 126 4K Mixed 59 204% 75.4 MB/s	DQ Read 1,024 DQ Write 882 DQ Mixed 864 672% 923 MB/s
Poor: 153% ↑ This bench: 237% Great: 254%
Sandisk Extreme SSD 500GB 4,692 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 466GB free Firmware: 1012 SusWrite @10s intervals: 410 399 405 404 400 401 MB/s Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	80.1% Excellent	Read 462 Write 440 Mixed 229 SusWrite 403 86% 384 MB/s	4K Read 23.7 4K Write 38.8 4K Mixed 24 87% 28.8 MB/s	DQ Read 241 DQ Write 220 DQ Mixed 205 161% 222 MB/s
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 80.1% Great: 83%
Seagate Backup+ Hub BK 6TB 10,357 User benchmarks, average bench 60% 1.5TB free Firmware: D781 SusWrite @10s intervals: 91 98 100 98 99 102 MB/s Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile)	45% Average	Read 57.3 Write 110 Mixed 78.3 SusWrite 98.1 64% 85.8 MB/s	4K Read 1.2 4K Write 4.5 4K Mixed 0.5 189% 2.07 MB/s
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 45% Great: 90%
WD Red 4TB (2013)-$110 55,507 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 2TB free Firmware: 82.00A82 SusWrite @10s intervals: 65 66 68 69 69 69 MB/s Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	40.4% Average	Read 72.5 Write 70.8 Mixed 47 SusWrite 67.7 48% 64.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2.3 4K Mixed 0.9 172% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 40.4% Great: 100%
WD Red 4TB (2013)-$110 55,507 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 422GB free Firmware: 82.00A82 SusWrite @10s intervals: 72 73 72 76 74 74 MB/s Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	42.2% Average	Read 72.7 Write 65.8 Mixed 45 SusWrite 73.6 47% 64.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2.8 4K Mixed 0.5 137% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 42.2% Great: 100%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3000 C16 2x16GB 15,358 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 2 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3000 MHz Performing above expectations (72^nd percentile)	93.2% Outstanding	MC Read 35.7 MC Write 35.8 MC Mixed 29.3 96% 33.6 GB/s	SC Read 17.9 SC Write 34.1 SC Mixed 24.8 73% 25.6 GB/s	Latency 56.7 70% 56.7 ns
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 93.2% Great: 104%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Z390 Pro4 Builds (Compare 4,809 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 110%

UFO

Desktop 99%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 93%

Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Asrock Z390 Pro4 - $190

CPU
Core i5-9600KIntel $155Bench 93%, 321,194 samples	1,185x
Core i7-9700KIntel $252Bench 97%, 550,833 samples	1,114x
Core i9-9900KIntel $410Bench 98%, 354,223 samples	523x

GPU
RTX 2070S (Super)Nvidia $210Bench 115%, 663,603 samples	374x
RTX 2070Nvidia $200Bench 104%, 478,117 samples	333x
RTX 2060Nvidia $324Bench 90%, 645,160 samples	312x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $90Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	194x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	139x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	136x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $45Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	189x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $36Bench 84%, 287,720 samples	129x
TEAMGROUP-UD4-3000 2x8GBUnknownBench 82%, 74,390 samples	129x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 125% - Outstanding

Total price: $690

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16