Gigabyte GA-G1.Sniper B6-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 43%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics50.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive106% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemGigabyte G1.Sniper B6
MotherboardGigabyte GA-G1.Sniper B6-CF  (all builds)
Memory8.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150820
Uptime2.6 Days
Run DateDec 20 '19 at 11:46
Run Duration175 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU 15%
Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4790-$135
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
78.4% Very good
Memory 91
1-Core 105
2-Core 216
78% 137 Pts
4-Core 355
8-Core 523
55% 439 Pts
64-Core 565
35% 565 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 78.4%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130
CLim: 1400 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 19.11.1
Performing below potential (37th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
50.3% Above average
Lighting 60.4
Reflection 69.7
Parallax 86.1
49% 72.1 fps
MRender 71.6
Gravity 61.9
Splatting 59.9
52% 64.5 fps
Poor: 46%
This bench: 50.3%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
110GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 348 278 268 280 281 275 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
106% Outstanding
Read 475
Write 457
Mixed 363
SusWrite 288
89% 396 MB/s
4K Read 39.1
4K Write 87.6
4K Mixed 51.8
172% 59.5 MB/s
DQ Read 372
DQ Write 344
DQ Mixed 357
268% 358 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 106%
Great: 124%
HS-SSD-C2000 512GB
293GB free
Firmware: ECFM12.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 592 589 586 592 594 593 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
135% Outstanding
Read 636
Write 613
Mixed 275
SusWrite 591
119% 529 MB/s
4K Read 26.2
4K Write 98.5
4K Mixed 35.2
137% 53.3 MB/s
DQ Read 758
DQ Write 678
DQ Mixed 829
591% 755 MB/s
Poor: 135%
This bench: 135%
Great: 245%
Seagate ST750LM022 HN-M750MBB 750GB
96GB free
Firmware: 0002
SusWrite @10s intervals: 60 66 64 60 64 64 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
38.9% Below average
Read 72.2
Write 26
Mixed 46.5
SusWrite 63.1
38% 51.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
141% 1 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 38.9%
Great: 57%
Hitachi Deskstar P7K500 500GB-$159
126GB free
Firmware: A50E
SusWrite @10s intervals: 85 84 83 83 83 83 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
47.8% Average
Read 82.8
Write 86.5
Mixed 46
SusWrite 83.4
55% 74.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 1
178% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 47.8%
Great: 51%
WD WD2500BEVS-22UST0 250GB
73GB free
Firmware: 1A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 42 43 42 41 42 42 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
24.1% Poor
Read 41.5
Write 39.8
Mixed 27.5
SusWrite 42
28% 37.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.7
132% 1 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 24.1%
Great: 32%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KHX1600C10D3/8G 1302 1600 CL9 Series KHX1600C10D3/8G 1302 1600 CL9 Series 16GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (20th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
56.8% Above average
MC Read 20.2
MC Write 21
MC Mixed 17.6
56% 19.6 GB/s
SC Read 13.6
SC Write 19.2
SC Mixed 18.2
49% 17 GB/s
Latency 65.7
61% 65.7 ns
Poor: 54%
This bench: 56.8%
Great: 63%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-G1.Sniper B6-CF Builds (Compare 263 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-G1.Sniper B6-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 65% - Good Total price: $428
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback