Asus P8H61

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics21.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive31.2% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus P8H61  (all builds)
Memory6.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130922
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 01 '20 at 19:30
Run Duration201 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing above expectations (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3350P-$60
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
79.7% Very good
Memory 96.3
1-Core 96.5
2-Core 193
76% 128 Pts
4-Core 366
8-Core 365
49% 366 Pts
64-Core 366
23% 366 Pts
Poor: 53%
This bench: 79.7%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 460-$90
Asus(1043 04B2) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1200 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver:
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
21.6% Poor
Lighting 24.7
Reflection 30.8
Parallax 29.4
20% 28.3 fps
MRender 30.3
Gravity 24.5
Splatting 33.6
25% 29.5 fps
Poor: 17%
This bench: 21.6%
Great: 22%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Green 240GB (2018)-$53
200GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UF220400
SusWrite @10s intervals: 166 117 118 126 133 134 MB/s
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
31.2% Below average
Read 211
Write 195
Mixed 164
SusWrite 132
40% 176 MB/s
4K Read 13.6
4K Write 13.9
4K Mixed 13.4
45% 13.6 MB/s
DQ Read 17.7
DQ Write 8.9
DQ Mixed 15.9
11% 14.2 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 31.2%
Great: 55%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$29
409GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 118 119 122 121 121 121 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
78.3% Very good
Read 152
Write 146
Mixed 76
SusWrite 121
91% 124 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1.1
218% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 78.3%
Great: 109%
Toshiba DT01ACA200 2TB-$60
1.5TB free
Firmware: MX4OABB0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 155 153 156 156 156 155 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
90% Outstanding
Read 158
Write 152
Mixed 35.7
SusWrite 155
90% 125 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.6
155% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 90%
Great: 108%
Kingston DataTraveler 2.0 16GB
1GB free, PID 6545
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.9 4.8 4.6 4.8 4.8 4.7 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
4.65% Terrible
Read 21.6
Write 16.1
Mixed 4.3
SusWrite 4.6
14% 11.6 MB/s
4K Read 2.2
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
8% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.65%
Great: 6%
USB 2.0 Flash Drive 8GB
4GB free, PID 102e
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.2 3.6 3.6 3.6 3.6 3.5 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
2.86% Terrible
Read 10.2
Write 3
Mixed 4.8
SusWrite 3.5
6% 5.38 MB/s
4K Read 2.6
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
10% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 2.86%
Great: 7%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix DMT451E6BFR8C-PB 86D3 DBLT4GN128S 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
62% Good
MC Read 22.9
MC Write 22
MC Mixed 18.8
61% 21.2 GB/s
SC Read 18.2
SC Write 17.1
SC Mixed 18.1
51% 17.8 GB/s
Latency 53.1
75% 53.1 ns
Poor: 45%
This bench: 62%
Great: 62%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8H61 Builds (Compare 399 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P8H61 - $77

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 85% - Excellent Total price: $213
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback