Asrock B450M Steel Legend

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 102%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 96%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 93%
Nuclear submarine
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 93.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics106% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive182% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsrock B450M Steel Legend  (all builds)
Memory12.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191127
Uptime3.7 Days
Run DateMar 07 '20 at 03:30
Run Duration199 Seconds
Run User MYS-User
Background CPU7%
Watch Gameplay: 2070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3600-$84
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
93.4% Outstanding
Memory 83.8
1-Core 144
2-Core 290
94% 173 Pts
4-Core 554
8-Core 820
86% 686 Pts
64-Core 1053
65% 1053 Pts
Poor: 73%
This bench: 93.4%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070-$200
Nvidia(10DE 12FE) ≥ 4GB; Galax RTX 2070 Mini
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 442.50
Performing below potential (67th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
106% Outstanding
Lighting 132
Reflection 126
Parallax 142
107% 133 fps
MRender 178
Gravity 126
Splatting 105
108% 136 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 106%
Great: 112%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
PNY CS3030 250GB SSD
122GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CS303225
SusWrite @10s intervals: 479 222 234 209 253 208 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
182% Outstanding
Read 1,210
Write 1,079
Mixed 1,084
SusWrite 268
204% 910 MB/s
4K Read 47.9
4K Write 189
4K Mixed 78
273% 105 MB/s
DQ Read 790
DQ Write 691
DQ Mixed 298
345% 593 MB/s
Poor: 94%
This bench: 182%
Great: 214%
T-force 250GB 256GB
201GB free
Firmware: P1205E
SusWrite @10s intervals: 464 463 463 473 473 475 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
114% Outstanding
Read 511
Write 476
Mixed 431
SusWrite 469
106% 472 MB/s
4K Read 32.3
4K Write 104
4K Mixed 47.5
165% 61.1 MB/s
DQ Read 252
DQ Write 361
DQ Mixed 258
209% 290 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 114%
Great: 116%
WDC WD15 EARS-00MVWB0 1.5TB
251GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.1 0 0 0 6.3 36 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
12.1% Very poor
Read 38
Write 33.8
Mixed 28.3
SusWrite 7
34% 26.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
81% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 12.1%
Great: 44%
WDC WD15 EURS-63S48Y0 1.5TB
220GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 32 33 33 33 34 30 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
19.1% Very poor
Read 37.7
Write 36.8
Mixed 29
SusWrite 32.3
46% 34 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.7
98% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 19.1%
Great: 19%
WDC WD20 EURS-63S48Y0 2TB
119GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.1 4.3 4.2 4.2 4.3 7.2 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
12.8% Very poor
Read 38
Write 32.3
Mixed 28.3
SusWrite 4.7
32% 25.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.7
94% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 12.8%
Great: 43%
WDC WD40 EFRX-68WT0N0 4TB
3TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0 0.1 0.1 0 0.1 7.9 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
13.4% Very poor
Read 38.3
Write 37
Mixed 31.8
SusWrite 1.4
35% 27.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1
119% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 13.4%
Great: 60%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 3200 C16 Series 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
87.1% Excellent
MC Read 34.5
MC Write 24
MC Mixed 34.6
89% 31 GB/s
SC Read 25.4
SC Write 23.4
SC Mixed 33.5
78% 27.4 GB/s
Latency 73.8
54% 73.8 ns
Poor: 62%
This bench: 87.1%
Great: 109%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical B450M Steel Legend Builds (Compare 8,207 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 78%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 74%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asrock B450M Steel Legend - $90

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 83% - Excellent Total price: $471
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $158
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback